• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者健康问卷-9 的验证性因子分析:一项来自脊髓损伤模型系统的参与者研究。

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9: a study of the participants from the spinal cord injury model systems.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, 77 President St, C101, MSC 700, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

出版信息

PM R. 2011 Jun;3(6):533-40; quiz 540. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.03.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.03.003
PMID:21665166
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the factor structure of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, a measure of depression, in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, confirmatory factor analytic study.

SETTING

Community.

PARTICIPANTS

Data for 7296 persons with an SCI who had sustained their injury at least 1 year prior to assessment and who had complete Patient Health Questionnaire-9 data collected at a follow-up interview were drawn from the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center Database.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Factor structure of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a marginal fit for the single factor solution (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.086), whereas the solution with 5 somatic items and 4 nonsomatic items had the best fit (RMSEA = 0.054) among 2-factor models that used all 9 items. Of the models that used fewer than 9 items, the best fit was for the 6-item solution with 3 somatic items (sleep, appetite, and fatigue) and 3 nonsomatic items (feeling down, feeling bad about self, and suicidal ideation; RMSEA = 0.043). Similar results were found across the strata except for the Hispanic group (for whom no model fit well).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the results of this analysis that support a 2-factor structure of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in persons with SCI, the next step in this line of research is to validate each of these dimensions against other ways of measuring depression.

摘要

目的

检验用于评估脊髓损伤(SCI)患者抑郁程度的患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)的因子结构。

设计

横断面、验证性因子分析研究。

地点

社区。

参与者

从国家脊髓损伤统计中心数据库中抽取了 7296 名在评估前至少 1 年发生 SCI 且在随访访谈中完整收集 PHQ-9 数据的 SCI 患者的数据。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

PHQ-9 的因子结构。

结果

验证性因子分析表明,单因子模型的拟合度尚可(近似均方根误差 [RMSEA] = 0.086),而使用所有 9 个项目的 2 因子模型中,包含 5 个躯体项目和 4 个非躯体项目的模型拟合度最佳(RMSEA = 0.054)。在使用少于 9 个项目的模型中,拟合度最佳的是包含 3 个躯体项目(睡眠、食欲和疲劳)和 3 个非躯体项目(情绪低落、自我感觉不好和自杀意念)的 6 项模型(RMSEA = 0.043)。除了西班牙裔群体(没有模型拟合较好),在其他各亚组中都得到了类似的结果。

结论

鉴于这项分析支持 SCI 患者 PHQ-9 的 2 因子结构,下一步研究是针对每种维度,用其他方法测量抑郁程度进行验证。

相似文献

1
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9: a study of the participants from the spinal cord injury model systems.患者健康问卷-9 的验证性因子分析:一项来自脊髓损伤模型系统的参与者研究。
PM R. 2011 Jun;3(6):533-40; quiz 540. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.03.003.
2
Factor structure and predictive validity of somatic and nonsomatic symptoms from the patient health questionnaire-9: a longitudinal study after spinal cord injury.患者健康问卷-9 躯体和非躯体症状的因子结构和预测效度:脊髓损伤后的纵向研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Aug;91(8):1218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.04.015.
3
Mechanical ventilation, health, and quality of life following spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤后的机械通气、健康和生活质量。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Mar;92(3):457-63. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.237.
4
Association of internet use and depression among the spinal cord injury population.互联网使用与脊髓损伤人群抑郁的关联。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;95(2):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
5
Evaluating a spinal cord injury-specific model of depression and quality of life.评估一种特定于脊髓损伤的抑郁和生活质量模型。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):455-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.029. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
6
A pilot study to modify the SF-36V physical functioning scale for use with veterans with spinal cord injury.一项针对脊髓损伤退伍军人修改SF-36V身体功能量表的试点研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Aug;87(8):1059-66. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.010.
7
Barriers and facilitators to employment after spinal cord injury: underlying dimensions and their relationship to labor force participation.脊髓损伤后就业的障碍和促进因素:潜在维度及其与劳动力参与的关系。
Spinal Cord. 2011 Feb;49(2):285-91. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.110. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
8
The 'risk inventory for persons with spinal cord injury': development and preliminary validation of a risk assessment tool for spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤患者风险清单:脊髓损伤风险评估工具的制定与初步验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(3):230-8. doi: 10.3109/09638280903095957.
9
Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.医学结果研究中身体功能项目的项目反应理论分析。
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000246649.43232.82.
10
An exploration of modifiable risk factors for depression after spinal cord injury: which factors should we target?脊髓损伤后抑郁的可调节风险因素探讨:我们应该针对哪些因素?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 May;93(5):775-81. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.020. Epub 2012 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Validity and Reliability of the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 on Screening for Major Depression in Spanish Speaking Immigrants in Chile: A Cross-Sectional Study.《PHQ-9 和 PHQ-2 在智利西班牙语移民中筛查重度抑郁症的有效性和可靠性:一项横断面研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13975. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113975.
2
Validity and reliability of the Patient Health Questionnaire scale (PHQ-9) among university students of Bangladesh.孟加拉国大学生患者健康问卷量表(PHQ-9)的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 8;17(6):e0269634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269634. eCollection 2022.
3
Pilot clinical trial of a clinical meditation and imagery intervention for chronic pain after spinal cord injury.
脊髓损伤后慢性疼痛的临床冥想和意象干预的初步临床试验。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2022 May;45(3):339-353. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1970894. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
4
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9: A study amongst tuberculosis patients in the Free State province.患者健康问卷-9的验证性因素分析:自由邦省结核病患者的一项研究。
S Afr J Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 21;35(1):242. doi: 10.4102/sajid.v35i1.242. eCollection 2020.
5
The factor structure of depressive symptoms in patients with obesity enrolled in the RAINBOW clinical trial.RAINBOW 临床试验中肥胖患者抑郁症状的因子结构。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb 15;281:367-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.105. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
6
Factorial validity of the Twi versions of five measures of mental health and well-being in Ghana.加纳五种心理健康和幸福感测量工具的繁体中文版本的因子有效性。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 11;15(8):e0236707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236707. eCollection 2020.
7
Do measures of depressive symptoms function differently in people with spinal cord injury versus primary care patients: the CES-D, PHQ-9, and PROMIS-D.与初级保健患者相比,抑郁症状测量指标在脊髓损伤患者中作用是否不同:流调中心用抑郁量表(CES-D)、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和患者报告结果测量信息系统抑郁量表(PROMIS-D)。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Jan;26(1):139-148. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1363-x. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
8
Measuring depression after spinal cord injury: Development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Depression item bank and linkage with PHQ-9.脊髓损伤后抑郁的测量:SCI-QOL抑郁条目库的开发、心理测量特征及其与PHQ-9的关联
J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 May;38(3):335-46. doi: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000020.
9
Assessing measurement invariance of three depression scales between neurologic samples and community samples.评估三种抑郁量表在神经疾病样本和社区样本之间的测量不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Aug;24(8):1829-34. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0927-5. Epub 2015 Jan 29.