Psychiatry Research and Teaching Unit, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Level 1, Mental Health Center, The Liverpool Hospital, Corner of Forbes and Campbell Streets, Liverpool NSW 2170, Australia.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 May 20.
There has been an increasing interest in the role of gross injustices in generating pathological states of anger. The goal of this study amongst 41 West Papuan refugees conducted in Australia between 2007 and 2010 was to explore the phenomenology of Sakit Hati, a condition in which there appeared to be a close link between human rights violations and anger. West Papuan refugee participants made repeated reference to the condition of Sakit Hati in the early phase of the study so that the remainder of the study focused specifically on this construct. The qualitative approach involved an iterative process including focus groups, in-depth interviews, and semi-structured confirmatory interviews. The research revealed that Sakit Hati included elements of chronic brooding, resentment and anger attributed to experiences of injustice, a state that created vulnerability to episodes of explosive rage and aggression in response to reminders of persecution. Sakit Hati was distinguished from a depression-loss constellation, Susah Hati, although the two reactions overlapped. Sakit Hati led to substantial personal suffering and interpersonal difficulties. The intractable political conditions in West Papua made it difficult to achieve a durable resolution for the condition. Sakit Hati provides a cross-cultural illustration of the nexus between injustice and chronic anger, demonstrating how this dynamic interaction can be perpetuated by ongoing social and political forces. Greater attention may be warranted by psychiatric classification systems to the recognition of anger as an affective state that may be provoked and maintained by experiences of injustice.
人们越来越关注严重不公正现象在产生病理性愤怒状态方面的作用。本研究于 2007 年至 2010 年在澳大利亚对 41 名西巴布亚难民进行,旨在探讨 Sakit Hati 的现象学,这种病症似乎与人权侵犯和愤怒之间存在密切联系。西巴布亚难民参与者在研究的早期阶段多次提到 Sakit Hati 的状况,因此研究的其余部分专门关注这一结构。定性方法包括一个迭代过程,包括焦点小组、深入访谈和半结构化确认访谈。研究表明,Sakit Hati 包括慢性沉思、怨恨和愤怒的元素,这些元素归因于不公正的经历,这种状态使人容易因被提醒遭受迫害而产生爆发性愤怒和攻击的易感性。Sakit Hati 与 Susah Hati(一种抑郁-失落的组合)不同,尽管这两种反应重叠。Sakit Hati 导致了巨大的个人痛苦和人际困难。西巴布亚的棘手政治状况使得该病症难以持久解决。Sakit Hati 提供了不公正和慢性愤怒之间联系的跨文化例证,展示了这种动态相互作用如何可以通过持续的社会和政治力量来延续。精神病学分类系统可能需要更加关注将愤怒识别为一种情感状态,这种状态可能会因不公正的经历而引发和维持。