Istanbul University Epilepsy Center, Istanbul, Turkey Department of Neurology, Istanbul Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Epilepsia. 2011 Aug;52(8):1459-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03126.x. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
Studies on seizures only with an alteration of consciousness were limited mainly to generalized epilepsy. This seizure type has been described rarely in focal epilepsy. We aimed to analyze the semiologic features of this seizure type in focal and generalized epilepsies in a blinded design.
A total of 338 seizure videos in 100 patients were included exclusively by semiologic criteria. Two investigators evaluated the seizure semiology (aura, seizure duration, blinking, mild motor phenomena including automatisms, and so on) from the videos. Primarily the ictal electroencephalography (EEGs) studies and all laboratory findings were evaluated for the localization of the epileptogenic zone and delineating the syndromes, in the second step.
Of the focal epilepsy patients (n = 57), the epileptogenic zone could be localized to the temporal (n = 20), frontal (n = 9), and parietooccipital (n = 3) regions. The most common etiology of the generalized epilepsy patients (n = 43) was presumably genetic (n = 33). The presence of aura (none in generalized epilepsy vs. 35% in focal epilepsy; p = 0.0008), lack of blinking (19.3% in focal vs 65.1% in generalized epilepsy; p = 0.01), and longer seizure duration (generalized 14.3 ± 17.7 s vs focal 54.9 ± 40.1 s; p < 0.0001) are significantly associated with focal epilepsy, whereas high seizure frequency (p = 0.002), family history of epilepsy (p = 0.016), and responsiveness to therapy (p = 0.004) point to generalized epilepsy with logistic regression analysis.
Seizures consisting mainly of an alteration in consciousness may originate from any brain lobe in focal epilepsies and also occur in generalized epilepsies. Several semiologic and clinical features that help to differentiate between focal and generalized epilepsy should be considered in the syndrome diagnosis.
仅改变意识的发作的研究主要集中在全面性癫痫上。这种发作类型在局灶性癫痫中很少被描述。我们的目的是在盲法设计中分析局灶性和全面性癫痫中这种发作类型的症状特征。
共有 100 名患者的 338 段发作视频仅通过症状学标准纳入。两名研究者从视频中评估发作的症状学(先兆、发作持续时间、眨眼、轻度运动现象包括自动症等)。首先,评估癫痫灶的定位和综合征的明确,主要通过发作期脑电图(EEG)研究和所有实验室发现,第二步进行。
在局灶性癫痫患者(n = 57)中,癫痫灶可定位于颞叶(n = 20)、额叶(n = 9)和顶枕叶(n = 3)区域。全身性癫痫患者(n = 43)最常见的病因可能是遗传(n = 33)。先兆的存在(全身性癫痫中无先兆 vs. 局灶性癫痫中 35%;p = 0.0008)、无眨眼(局灶性癫痫中 19.3% vs. 全身性癫痫中 65.1%;p = 0.01)和更长的发作持续时间(全身性癫痫 14.3 ± 17.7 s vs. 局灶性癫痫 54.9 ± 40.1 s;p < 0.0001)与局灶性癫痫显著相关,而高发作频率(p = 0.002)、癫痫家族史(p = 0.016)和对治疗的反应性(p = 0.004)通过逻辑回归分析提示全身性癫痫。
主要表现为意识改变的发作可能起源于局灶性癫痫的任何脑叶,也可能发生在全身性癫痫中。在综合征诊断中应考虑一些有助于区分局灶性和全身性癫痫的症状和临床特征。