*Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, NEOUCOM, Rootstown, OH, USA; Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH, USA.
Integr Comp Biol. 2008 Aug;48(2):294-311. doi: 10.1093/icb/icn071. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
Biologists that study mammals continue to discuss the evolution of and functional variation in jaw-muscle activity during chewing. A major barrier to addressing these issues is collecting sufficient in vivo data to adequately capture neuromuscular variation in a clade. We combine data on jaw-muscle electromyography (EMG) collected during mastication from 14 species of primates and one of treeshrews to assess patterns of neuromuscular variation in primates. All data were collected and analyzed using the same methods. We examine the variance components for EMG parameters using a nested ANOVA design across successive hierarchical factors from chewing cycle through species for eight locations in the masseter and temporalis muscles. Variation in jaw-muscle EMGs was not distributed equally across hierarchical levels. The timing of peak EMG activity showed the largest variance components among chewing cycles. Relative levels of recruitment of jaw muscles showed the largest variance components among chewing sequences and cycles. We attribute variation among chewing cycles to (1) changes in food properties throughout the chewing sequence, (2) variation in bite location, and (3) the multiple ways jaw muscles can produce submaximal bite forces. We hypothesize that variation among chewing sequences is primarily related to variation in properties of food. The significant proportion of variation in EMGs potentially linked to food properties suggests that experimental biologists must pay close attention to foods given to research subjects in laboratory-based studies of feeding. The jaw muscles exhibit markedly different variance components among species suggesting that primate jaw muscles have evolved as distinct functional units. The balancing-side deep masseter (BDM) exhibits the most variation among species. This observation supports previous hypotheses linking variation in the timing and activation of the BDM to symphyseal fusion in anthropoid primates and in strepsirrhines with robust symphyses. The working-side anterior temporalis shows a contrasting pattern with little variation in timing and relative activation across primates. The consistent recruitment of this muscle suggests that primates have maintained their ability to produce vertical jaw movements and force in contrast to the evolutionary changes in transverse occlusal forces driven by the varying patterns of activation in the BDM.
研究哺乳动物的生物学家一直在讨论咀嚼过程中颌肌活动的进化和功能变化。解决这些问题的一个主要障碍是收集足够的体内数据,以充分捕捉一个进化枝中的神经肌肉变化。我们结合了来自 14 种灵长类动物和一种树鼩的咀嚼过程中颌肌肌电图(EMG)的数据,以评估灵长类动物的神经肌肉变化模式。所有数据均使用相同的方法进行收集和分析。我们使用嵌套 ANOVA 设计,在从咀嚼周期到物种的连续层次因子中,检查了 EMG 参数的方差分量,在咀嚼肌和颞肌的 8 个部位。颌肌 EMG 的变化不是均匀分布在层次级别上的。在咀嚼周期中,峰值 EMG 活动的时间显示出最大的方差分量。在咀嚼序列和咀嚼周期中,下颌肌的相对募集程度显示出最大的方差分量。我们将咀嚼周期之间的变化归因于(1)咀嚼序列过程中食物特性的变化,(2)咬位的变化,以及(3)颌肌产生亚最大咬合力的多种方式。我们假设咀嚼序列之间的变化主要与食物特性的变化有关。与食物特性相关的 EMG 变化的显著比例表明,实验生物学家在实验室喂养研究中必须密切关注给予研究对象的食物。颌肌在物种之间表现出明显不同的方差分量,这表明灵长类动物的颌肌已经进化为不同的功能单位。平衡侧深部咀嚼肌(BDM)在物种之间表现出最大的变化。这一观察结果支持了先前的假设,即 BDM 的时间和激活变化与类人猿的下颌融合以及具有坚固下颌的食虫目动物的融合有关。工作侧前颞肌的表现则相反,在灵长类动物中,其时间和相对激活的变化很小。这块肌肉的持续募集表明,与 BDM 激活模式的变化驱动的横向咬合力的进化变化相比,灵长类动物保持了产生垂直下颌运动和力的能力。