Schneider Joseph R, Verta Michael J, Alonzo Marc J, Hahn David, Patel Nilesh H, Kim Stanley
Vascular and Interventional Program of Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, IL 60190, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011 Jul;45(5):391-7. doi: 10.1177/1538574411405548. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
Many investigators including TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) recommend against primary endovascular treatment for severe (TASC C and D) superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease. Vein bypass is preferable but may not be appropriate due to comorbidities or lack of suitable vein. This study reviews our results with Viabahn stent graft-assisted subintimal recanalization (VASIR) for TASC C and D SFA atherosclerosis.
In all, 13 males and 14 females, mean age 72 ± 11 years underwent 28 VASIR for severe (TASC C 8 of 28, TASC D 20 of 28, and 5 of 28 no continuous infrapopliteal runoff artery) SFA disease. Indications were claudication (14 of 28 limbs), ischemic rest pain (6 of 28), and tissue loss (8 of 28). Viabahn stent graft-assisted subintimal recanalization was chosen instead of bypass due to comorbidities or lack of vein. Patients received aspirin and, if not already taking warfarin, they also received clopidogrel. Patients were examined with Ankle-brachial Index (ABI) and duplex scan at 1 month, then every 3 months after VASIR.
Viabahn stent graft-assisted subintimal recanalization was technically successful in all. Ankle-brachial Index averaged 0.47 ± 0.17 preprocedure, 0.89 ± 0.20 postprocedure, and increased by 0.15 or more in every case. Median follow-up is 20 months. There were 3 perioperative (<30 days) and 7 later failures including revision prior to any thrombosis. One patient required amputation. Four have died, 2 with patent grafts, none from causes related to VASIR, all more than 30 days post-VASIR. Estimated 1-year primary and secondary patency were 70% ± 11% and 73% ± 10%. Failure was not significantly associated with indications, comorbidities, or runoff status. There was a clear distinction between patients with early failure and the rest of the patients. None of the 8 patients with failure in the first 8 months after surgery has a patent graft. However, of 17 grafts primarily patent at 8 months, only 2 have failed (1 thrombosed and 1 required preemptive balloon angioplasty). There was a strong trend toward better patency with 6 and 7 mm diameter compared to 5 mm diameter stent grafts. Furthermore, although warfarin was not prescribed as part of the protocol, no patient taking warfarin before and who resumed warfarin after VASIR (n=4) suffered failure.
Despite significant early failures, we found VASIR to be durable in those who did not have early failure. Viabahn stent graft-assisted subintimal recanalization is an acceptable alternative to vein bypass in selected patients with severe SFA disease. Smaller arterial or stent graft diameter may be associated with poorer results. Warfarin may be valuable to reduce the risk of failure after VASIR.
包括跨大西洋跨学会共识(TASC)在内的许多研究者不建议对严重(TASC C和D级)股浅动脉(SFA)疾病进行初次血管内治疗。静脉搭桥术是更可取的选择,但由于合并症或缺乏合适的静脉,可能并不适用。本研究回顾了我们采用Viabahn覆膜支架辅助内膜下再通术(VASIR)治疗TASC C和D级SFA动脉粥样硬化的结果。
共有13名男性和14名女性,平均年龄72±11岁,因严重(TASC C级28例中的8例,TASC D级28例中的20例,28例中有5例无连续的腘下流出动脉)SFA疾病接受了28次VASIR治疗。适应症包括间歇性跛行(28条肢体中的14条)、缺血性静息痛(28条中的6条)和组织缺损(28条中的8条)。由于合并症或缺乏静脉,选择了Viabahn覆膜支架辅助内膜下再通术而非搭桥术。患者接受阿司匹林治疗,如果尚未服用华法林,还会接受氯吡格雷治疗。患者在术后1个月时接受踝肱指数(ABI)和双功超声扫描检查,之后每3个月检查一次。
Viabahn覆膜支架辅助内膜下再通术在技术上全部成功。术前ABI平均为0.47±0.17,术后为0.89±0.20,且每例患者的ABI均增加了0.15或更多。中位随访时间为20个月。围手术期(<30天)有3例失败,后期有7例失败,包括在任何血栓形成之前进行的翻修手术。1例患者需要截肢。4例患者死亡,2例患者的移植物通畅,均非与VASIR相关的原因导致死亡,均在VASIR术后30天以上。估计1年的一期和二期通畅率分别为70%±11%和73%±10%。失败与适应症、合并症或流出道状态无显著相关性。早期失败的患者与其他患者之间有明显区别。术后前8个月内失败的8例患者中,无一例移植物通畅。然而,在8个月时最初通畅的17例移植物中,只有2例失败(1例血栓形成,1例需要预防性球囊血管成形术)。与5mm直径的覆膜支架相比,6mm和7mm直径的覆膜支架有更好的通畅率趋势。此外,尽管华法林未作为方案的一部分使用,但术前服用华法林且VASIR术后恢复服用华法林的患者(n = 4)均未出现失败。
尽管早期有显著失败,但我们发现VASIR对那些没有早期失败的患者来说是持久有效的。Viabahn覆膜支架辅助内膜下再通术对于选定的严重SFA疾病患者是静脉搭桥术的可接受替代方案。较小的动脉或覆膜支架直径可能与较差的结果相关。华法林对于降低VASIR术后失败风险可能有价值。