Tsoi W S E, Zhang L A, Wang W Y, Tsang K L, Lo S K
Faculty of Arts and Sciences, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, 10 Lo Ping Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.
Child Care Health Dev. 2012 Jan;38(1):21-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01255.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
To systematically review the impact of different interventions on quality of life (QoL) for children with cerebral palsy.
English articles were sought from five major English databases from inceptions until March 2010. Keywords used consisted of four components (and their variants): (i) clinical condition: cerebral palsy; (ii) outcome measures: quality of life, well-being; (iii) study design: clinical trials; and (iv) target population: people aged 0-18.
Eight studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, all of which are of good to excellent quality (a Jadad score of 4 or above). The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, the TNO-AZL Children's Health-Related Quality of Life and the Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities were used to measure QoL. Significant positive results were reported by two studies using medicinal interventions (diazepam and intrathecal baclofen therapy, effect sizes 5.9, 9.1 respectively) and two studies employing motor control approach training (strength training and exercise training, former effect size being 3.8).
Current review suggests that positive effect was shown in medicinal and motor control interventions on QoL. However, no single interventional approach can demonstrate a consistent positive impact on QoL across different studies. Future studies are recommended to (i) provide a clear definition of QoL, and investigate the relationship between symptoms' severity and QoL; (ii) measure outcome at different time points to capture real effects of interventions; and (iii) make more use of valid outcome instruments, either self-report or parent/caregiver proxy reports.
系统评价不同干预措施对脑瘫患儿生活质量(QoL)的影响。
检索五个主要英文数据库自建库至2010年3月的英文文章。所用关键词由四个部分(及其变体)组成:(i)临床状况:脑瘫;(ii)结局指标:生活质量、幸福感;(iii)研究设计:临床试验;(iv)目标人群:0-18岁人群。
八项研究符合纳入标准,所有研究质量均为良好至优秀(Jadad评分4分及以上)。使用儿童残疾评定量表、儿童生活质量量表、荷兰国家公共卫生与环境研究所儿童健康相关生活质量量表以及照顾者优先事项和儿童残疾生活健康指数来测量生活质量。两项使用药物干预(地西泮和鞘内注射巴氯芬疗法,效应量分别为5.9、9.1)的研究以及两项采用运动控制方法训练(力量训练和运动训练,前者效应量为3.8)的研究报告了显著的阳性结果。
当前综述表明,药物和运动控制干预对生活质量有积极影响。然而,没有单一的干预方法能在不同研究中对生活质量表现出一致的积极影响。建议未来的研究:(i)明确生活质量的定义,并研究症状严重程度与生活质量之间的关系;(ii)在不同时间点测量结局以捕捉干预的实际效果;(iii)更多地使用有效的结局工具,无论是自我报告还是家长/照顾者代理报告。