Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamamach, Oita 879-5593, Japan.
Neurosci Lett. 2011 Aug 18;500(3):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.052. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
The present study evaluates the hypotheses that a GABAergic mechanism underlies neurobehavioral sequelae of carotid stenosis and that it can be reversed by carotid revascularization. We used the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT), short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), and cortical silent period (CSP) to evaluate cognitive function and cerebral cortical excitability in 16 carotid artery stenosis patients with cognitive impairment before carotid arterial stenting (CAS) and 1 month later. We compared the pre- and post-CAS results and those of 16 healthy controls. CSP was prolonged in patients compared with controls (195.8±18ms vs. 157.8±13.9ms; p<0.0001, unpaired t-test). Patients tended to a have high resting motor threshold and less pronounced SICI and ICF than controls, but differences were not significant. Decreased RBMT score was correlated with hyperperfusion and CSP increase after CAS. RBMT score increase was correlated with CSP normalization. LICI showed positive correlation with CSP. CSP may provide a means of probing the integrity of GABA(B)-ergic networks in an ischemic human brain. CSP and LICI are potential tools to explore neuronal function for improvement as well as impairment after carotid revascularization.
颈动脉狭窄的神经行为后遗症的基础是 GABA 能机制,颈动脉血运重建可以逆转这种机制。我们使用 Rivermead 行为记忆测试(RBMT)、短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI)、皮质内易化(ICF)、长间隔皮质内抑制(LICI)和皮质静息期(CSP)来评估认知功能和大脑皮质兴奋性在 16 名颈动脉狭窄伴认知障碍的患者颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)前和 1 个月后。我们比较了 CAS 前后的结果以及 16 名健康对照者的结果。与对照组相比,患者的 CSP 延长(195.8±18ms 与 157.8±13.9ms;p<0.0001,未配对 t 检验)。与对照组相比,患者的静息运动阈值较高,SICI 和 ICF 不明显,但差异无统计学意义。CAS 后,RBMT 评分降低与过度灌注和 CSP 增加相关。RBMT 评分的增加与 CSP 的正常化相关。LICI 与 CSP 呈正相关。CSP 可能提供一种方法来探测缺血性人脑 GABA(B)-能网络的完整性。CSP 和 LICI 是探索颈动脉血运重建后神经元功能改善和损害的潜在工具。