Suppr超能文献

电抽搐治疗刺激阶段心动过缓的预测因素。

Predictors of bradycardia during the stimulation phase of electroconvulsive therapy.

机构信息

Christophsbad Clinic, Göppingen, Germany.

出版信息

J ECT. 2011 Sep;27(3):201-6. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31821df347.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Temporary asystole can be detected at various time points during electroconvulsive treatment. We carefully monitored and documented its incidence during stimulation to evaluate currently known and assumed predictors.

METHOD

All treatments over a 20-month period in 2 separate institutions were recorded prospectively. Data from 119 patients comprising 720 treatments were suitable for multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

Electrode placement was the most influential determinant. Treatment series using right unilateral placement (64 patients and 291 traces) produced a mean (SD) asystole duration of 5.64 (2.88) seconds (range, 1.21-11.20 seconds), compared to a duration of 0.80 (0.21) seconds (range, 0.47-1.71 seconds) in bifrontal series (55 patients, 429 traces). Multiple regression analysis showed no independent effect of body weight, age, β-blocker medication, or preexisting heart block. Stimulus dose and succinylcholine dose had no influence in univariate analyses. Cardiac action in bifrontal treatment series was highly predictable using baseline values. During unilateral stimulation, between-subject differences accounted for 79% of the observed variation.

CONCLUSIONS

The heart rate during stimulation depends mainly on electrode positioning. A yet unidentified, probably constitutional factor is responsible for the broad range of asystole duration brought about by right unilateral electrode placement. Any assessment using interindividual analysis will therefore be biased as long as that factor remains unknown.

摘要

目的

在电抽搐治疗过程中的不同时间点可以检测到暂时的停搏。我们仔细监测并记录其在刺激过程中的发生情况,以评估目前已知和假设的预测因子。

方法

在 2 个不同机构的 20 个月期间,对所有治疗进行前瞻性记录。包含 119 名患者的 720 次治疗的数据适合多元回归分析。

结果

电极放置是最具影响力的决定因素。使用右侧单侧放置(64 名患者和 291 次记录)的治疗系列产生的停搏持续时间的平均值(标准差)为 5.64(2.88)秒(范围,1.21-11.20 秒),而双侧额部系列(55 名患者,429 次记录)的持续时间为 0.80(0.21)秒(范围,0.47-1.71 秒)。多元回归分析显示体重、年龄、β受体阻滞剂用药或预先存在的心脏阻滞无独立影响。刺激剂量和琥珀酰胆碱剂量在单变量分析中没有影响。使用基线值,双侧额部治疗系列中的心脏活动具有高度可预测性。在单侧刺激期间,个体间差异占观察到的变异的 79%。

结论

刺激过程中的心率主要取决于电极定位。一个尚未确定的、可能是先天的因素,导致了右侧单侧电极放置引起的停搏持续时间的广泛变化。只要该因素未知,任何基于个体间分析的评估都会存在偏差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验