Overbeek G, Vermulst A, de Graaf R, Ten Have M, Engels R, Scholte R
Universiteit Utrecht, Facultiet Sociale Wetenschappen Ontwikkelingspsychologie te Utrecht.
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2011;53(6):321-32.
In psychiatric research it is often assumed that detrimental effects of negative life events on mental health can be buffered by a number of positive life events. However, there is no convincing empirical evidence that this assumption is correct; it can even be argued that positive life events act as additional stressors rather than as buffers, leading to a continuation of a chaotic life course and an increase in the risk of affective disorders.
To find out whether positive life events were associated with a higher risk of the occurrence of mood disorders and whether such an association could be explained by a number of negative life events that individuals had experienced.
We used data from 4,796 adults, aged 18-64, collected at two measurement moments (i.e. 1997 and 1999) of NEMESIS, a Dutch prospective-epidemiological study. As a basis for our measurements we used dsm-iii-r diagnoses of major depressive disorders and dysthymia and the Life Events and Difficulties Schedules LEDS.
A multivariate (MPlus) path analysis demonstrated that positive life events were not, in themselves, significantly predictive of affective disorders. Positive life events were only related to the risk of mood disorders when they co-occurred with a high number of negative life events.
In accordance with a chaotic life-course hypothesis, positive events were not found to buffer the detrimental impact of negative life events, but when they are part of an erratic course of life they can pose an extra threat to an individual’s mental health.
在精神病学研究中,人们常常认为负面生活事件对心理健康的有害影响可以被一些正面生活事件所缓冲。然而,没有令人信服的实证证据表明这一假设是正确的;甚至可以认为,正面生活事件起到的是额外压力源的作用,而非缓冲作用,导致混乱的生活轨迹持续下去,并增加情感障碍的风险。
探究正面生活事件是否与情绪障碍发生的较高风险相关,以及这种关联是否可以由个体经历的一些负面生活事件来解释。
我们使用了来自荷兰前瞻性流行病学研究NEMESIS的4796名18 - 64岁成年人在两个测量时间点(即1997年和1999年)收集的数据。作为我们测量的基础,我们使用了对重度抑郁症和心境恶劣障碍的dsm - iii - r诊断以及生活事件和困难量表(LEDS)。
多变量(MPlus)路径分析表明,正面生活事件本身并不能显著预测情感障碍。只有当正面生活事件与大量负面生活事件同时发生时,才与情绪障碍风险相关。
根据混乱生活轨迹假说,未发现正面事件能缓冲负面生活事件的有害影响,但当它们成为不稳定生活轨迹的一部分时,会对个体心理健康构成额外威胁。