Suppr超能文献

收缩压和舒张压、平均动脉压及脉压对中东人群心血管事件和死亡率的预测作用

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure for prediction of cardiovascular events and mortality in a Middle Eastern population.

作者信息

Hadaegh Farzad, Shafiee Gita, Hatami Masumeh, Azizi Feridoun

机构信息

Prevention of Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Yaman Street, Velenjak, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Blood Press. 2012 Feb;21(1):12-8. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2011.585808. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

Abstract

We compared systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP) as independent predictors of cardiovascular disease (CVD), total and CVD mortality among an Iranian population. The study conducted among 5991 subjects aged ≥ 30 years without baseline CVD and antihypertensive medication. The mean of two measurements of SBP and DBP, in sitting position, was considered the subject's blood pressure. During a median follow-up of 8.7 years, 346 CVD and 157 deaths, 63 attributed to CVD, occurred. Hazard ratios (HRs) of each outcome were calculated for a one standard deviation (SD) increase in each blood pressure (BP) measures. In multivariate models, all BP measures were associated with increased risk of CVD regardless of age. In those aged < 60 years, SBP, DBP, PP and MAP were associated with total mortality (p < 0.05), but in subjects aged ≥ 60 years, only SBP and PP increased risk of total mortality significantly. In multivariate analyses, a 1SD increase in SBP, PP and MAP were associated with 35%, 31% and 28% increased risk of CVD mortality (p < 0.05). In terms of fitness and discrimination of models, DBP, PP and MAP were not superior to SBP. In conclusion, our findings provided further evidence from a Middle Eastern population, in support of SBP predictability for CVD events and CVD and all-cause mortality compared with other BP measures.

摘要

我们比较了收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)和脉压(PP),将其作为伊朗人群中心血管疾病(CVD)、全因死亡率和CVD死亡率的独立预测指标。该研究在5991名年龄≥30岁且无基线CVD及未服用抗高血压药物的受试者中进行。取受试者坐位时SBP和DBP两次测量值的平均值作为其血压。在中位随访8.7年期间,发生了346例CVD事件和157例死亡,其中63例归因于CVD。计算每种血压(BP)测量值每增加一个标准差(SD)时各结局的风险比(HRs)。在多变量模型中,无论年龄大小,所有BP测量值均与CVD风险增加相关。在年龄<60岁的人群中,SBP、DBP、PP和MAP与全因死亡率相关(p<0.05),但在年龄≥60岁的受试者中,只有SBP和PP显著增加全因死亡风险。在多变量分析中,SBP、PP和MAP每增加1SD,CVD死亡风险分别增加35%、31%和28%(p<0.05)。在模型的拟合优度和辨别力方面,DBP、PP和MAP并不优于SBP。总之,我们的研究结果从中东人群中提供了进一步的证据,支持与其他BP测量值相比,SBP对CVD事件、CVD及全因死亡率的预测能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验