• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者氯吡格雷抗血小板反应性的前瞻性评估与基因多态性和临床结局的关系。

Prospective evaluation of on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity over time in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention relationship with gene polymorphisms and clinical outcome.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Anna, LTTA Center, Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jun 21;57(25):2474-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.047.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.047
PMID:21679849
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the evolving pattern over time of on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (PR) and its relationship with genotype and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND

Whether on-clopidogrel PR and role of genotype differ over time is unknown.

METHODS

On-clopidogrel PR before percutaneous coronary intervention, and 1 and 6 months thereafter via VerifyNow P2Y12 (Accumetrics Inc., San Diego, California), CYP2C19*2, 17, CYP3A53, and ABCB1 polymorphisms were evaluated in 300 patients. Death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and bleedings were assessed up to 1 year.

RESULTS

On-clopidogrel PR varied significantly over time, being higher at baseline than at 1 and 6 months after. From baseline to 1 month, 83 of 300 patients varied their response status. This was mainly due to baseline poor responders becoming full responders (75 of 83). Genotype justifies roughly 18% of this trend. CYP2C19*2 and 17 influence on PR was consistent over time, whereas that of ABCB1 appeared of greater impact at baseline. On-clopidogrel PR at 1 month independently best predicts ischemic and bleeding events. We found a therapeutic window (86 to 238 P2Y₁₂ reactivity units) with a lower incidence of both ischemic and bleeding complications. A risk score was created by combining genotype (ABCB1 and CYP2C192), baseline PR, and creatinine clearance to predict 1-month poor responsiveness and 1-year poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients at steady state for clopidogrel undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, PR decreases from baseline to 1 month. Genotype influences ≈18% of this trend. On-clopidogrel PR at 1 month is the strongest predictor of adverse outcomes, and this can be predicted by combining genotype to baseline phenotype and clinical variables.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后氯吡格雷抵抗(PR)的演变模式及其与基因分型和临床结局的关系。

背景

氯吡格雷抵抗的时间变化和基因分型的作用尚不清楚。

方法

在 300 例患者中,通过 VerifyNow P2Y12(Accumetrics Inc.,加利福尼亚圣地亚哥)评估 PCI 前、PCI 后 1 个月和 6 个月的氯吡格雷抵抗,并评估 CYP2C19*2、17、CYP3A53 和 ABCB1 多态性。评估 1 年内的死亡、卒中和心肌梗死以及出血情况。

结果

氯吡格雷抵抗在时间上变化显著,基线时高于 1 个月和 6 个月时。从基线到 1 个月,300 例患者中有 83 例患者的反应状态发生变化。这主要是由于基线时反应不良的患者变为完全反应者(75/83)。基因分型大致解释了这一趋势的 18%。CYP2C192 和17 对 PR 的影响在时间上是一致的,而 ABCB1 的影响在基线时更大。1 个月时的氯吡格雷抵抗独立预测缺血和出血事件。我们发现了一个治疗窗口(86 至 238 P2Y₁₂反应单位),其缺血和出血并发症的发生率较低。通过结合基因型(ABCB1 和 CYP2C19*2)、基线 PR 和肌酐清除率,创建了一个风险评分来预测 1 个月时的不良反应和 1 年时的不良预后。

结论

在稳定接受氯吡格雷 PCI 的患者中,PR 从基线到 1 个月逐渐降低。基因分型约影响这一趋势的 18%。1 个月时的氯吡格雷抵抗是不良结局的最强预测因子,通过将基因型与基线表型和临床变量相结合,可以预测这种情况。

相似文献

1
Prospective evaluation of on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity over time in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention relationship with gene polymorphisms and clinical outcome.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者氯吡格雷抗血小板反应性的前瞻性评估与基因多态性和临床结局的关系。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jun 21;57(25):2474-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.047.
2
Carriage of cytochrome 2C19 polymorphism is associated with risk of high post-treatment platelet reactivity on high maintenance-dose clopidogrel of 150 mg/day: results of the ACCEL-DOUBLE (Accelerated Platelet Inhibition by a Double Dose of Clopidogrel According to Gene Polymorphism) study.细胞色素 2C19 多态性携带与高维持剂量(150mg/天)氯吡格雷治疗后高血小板反应风险相关:根据基因多态性的双重剂量氯吡格雷加速血小板抑制(ACCEL-DOUBLE)研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jul;3(7):731-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.05.007.
3
Impact of platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. A collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血小板反应性对临床结局的影响:个体参与者数据的协作荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 1;58(19):1945-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.059.
4
Long-term clinical outcome based on aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness status after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a 3T/2R (tailoring treatment with tirofiban in patients showing resistance to aspirin and/or resistance to clopidogrel) trial substudy.基于择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后阿司匹林和氯吡格雷反应状态的长期临床结局:3T/2R(替罗非班个体化治疗阿司匹林抵抗和/或氯吡格雷抵抗患者)试验亚研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Oct 26;56(18):1447-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.103.
5
Point-of-care measurement of clopidogrel responsiveness predicts clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention results of the ARMYDA-PRO (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Platelet Reactivity Predicts Outcome) study.氯吡格雷反应性的床旁检测可预测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的临床结局:ARMYDA-PRO(血管成形术期间减少心肌损伤的抗血小板治疗 - 血小板反应性预测结局)研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Sep 30;52(14):1128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.038.
6
Clinical outcomes of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in Koreans receiving elective percutaneous coronary intervention (from results of the CROSS VERIFY study).韩国行择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者治疗中血小板高反应性的临床结局(来自 CROSS VERIFY 研究结果)。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Dec 1;108(11):1556-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
7
Usefulness of platelet response to clopidogrel by point-of-care testing to predict bleeding outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Antiplatelet Therapy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty-Bleeding Study).应用即时检验评估血小板对氯吡格雷的反应预测行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者出血结局的价值(来自经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中抗血小板治疗减少心肌损伤-出血研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 1;107(7):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.025. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
8
Amlodipine, clopidogrel and CYP3A5 genetic variability: effects on platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.氨氯地平、氯吡格雷和 CYP3A5 遗传变异性:对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血小板反应性和临床结局的影响。
Heart. 2012 Sep;98(18):1366-72. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-301892. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
9
No association of ABCB1 C3435T genotype with clopidogrel response or risk of stent thrombosis in patients undergoing coronary stenting.ABCB1 C3435T 基因型与氯吡格雷反应或接受冠状动脉支架置入术的患者支架血栓形成风险无关。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb 1;5(1):82-8, S1-2. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965400. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
10
Cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction in acute coronary syndrome patients receiving coronary stenting are predicted by residual platelet reactivity to ADP detected by a point-of-care assay: a 12-month follow-up.通过即时检验检测的急性冠状动脉综合征患者对ADP的残余血小板反应性可预测接受冠状动脉支架植入术患者的心血管死亡和非致死性心肌梗死:一项12个月的随访研究
Circulation. 2009 Jan 20;119(2):237-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.812636. Epub 2008 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
De-escalation of antithrombotic treatment after acute coronary syndrome, a new paradigm.急性冠状动脉综合征后抗栓治疗的降阶梯:一种新范式
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;19(6):1537-1548. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03590-y. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
2
Pharmacogenomics of Cardiovascular Drugs for Atherothrombotic, Thromboembolic and Atherosclerotic Risk.心血管药物的药物基因组学与动脉粥样硬化血栓形成、血栓栓塞和动脉粥样硬化风险
Genes (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;14(11):2057. doi: 10.3390/genes14112057.
3
Antithrombotic treatment strategies in patients with established coronary atherosclerotic disease.
稳定性冠心病患者的抗血栓治疗策略。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Jul 29;9(5):462-496. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad032.
4
Impact of Low-Dose Prasugrel on Platelet Reactivity in Chronic Phase of Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CHAPERON): a Prospective Cohort Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后慢性期低剂量普拉格雷对血小板反应性的影响(CHAPERON):一项前瞻性队列研究。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Oct;38(5):947-957. doi: 10.1007/s10557-023-07454-z. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
5
Current concepts and novel targets for antiplatelet therapy.抗血小板治疗的当前概念和新靶点。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Sep;20(9):583-599. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00854-6. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
6
Platelet Reactivity and Cardiovascular Mortality Risk in the LURIC Study.LURIC研究中的血小板反应性与心血管死亡风险
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 28;12(5):1913. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051913.
7
The impact of high on-treatment platelet reactivity and fibrinogen levels on ischemic events in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective observational study.高治疗中血小板反应性和纤维蛋白原水平对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者缺血事件的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Apr;45(2):461-472. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01525-1. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
8
Mortality of Escalation and Modulation Antithrombotic Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.抗栓治疗在冠状动脉疾病患者中的升阶梯与降阶梯策略的死亡率:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2023 Jan;123(1):108-117. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757405. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
9
Platelet reactivity after clopidogrel loading in patients with acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中患者氯吡格雷负荷给药后的血小板反应性
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 24;13:887243. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.887243. eCollection 2022.
10
Clinical non-effectiveness of clopidogrel use for peripheral artery disease in patients with CYP2C19 polymorphisms: a systematic review.CYP2C19 基因多态性患者外周动脉疾病中氯吡格雷临床无效的系统评价。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Aug;78(8):1217-1225. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03346-7. Epub 2022 Jun 3.