University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Midwifery. 2012 Apr;28(2):236-46. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
to evaluate the effectiveness of a work-based module and in-service educational programme in perineal repair for midwives on their perceived level of competency undertaking this skill in clinical practice.
a quasi-experimental pre-post intervention case study combining a non-equivalent comparison group and evaluation action research.
six NHS consultant/midwifery led Trusts in South East England between December 2002 and 2006.
145 midwives from six NHS Trusts.
a post-registration work-based module in perineal repair for midwives and alternative two hour in-service perineal repair workshops across five intervention Trusts.
midwives' perceived level of competency and confidence undertaking perineal repair.
significantly greater numbers of midwives were able to practice perineal repair at higher levels of competency following an educational intervention in five intervention Trusts (P<.006). There was a non-significant difference in the comparison Trust (P<.535). In addition, an educational programme for midwives increased the numbers of senior student midwives who were able to participate in perineal repair confidently under the direct supervision of their mentor when they perceived that their mentor was confident and competent undertaking the procedure.
an educational programme in perineal repair can make a significant difference to the midwives' perceived level of competency and confidence when assessing and managing perineal trauma and repair.
competency and expertise are complex phenomena and the data has provided greater insight into the complex nature of workplace learning alongside the multiple factors influencing clinical decision-making such as staff shortage, time constraints and inadequate numbers of midwives who are able to instruct, supervise and assess competency in perineal repair. Funding for training is fundamental for the sustainability of future practice development.
评估基于工作的模块和在职教育计划对助产士进行会阴修复的效果,以评估他们在临床实践中进行该技能的能力感知水平。
准实验前后干预案例研究,结合非等效比较组和评价行动研究。
2002 年 12 月至 2006 年期间,英格兰东南部的六家 NHS 顾问/助产士领导的信托基金。
来自六家 NHS 信托基金的 145 名助产士。
针对助产士的会阴修复的注册后基于工作的模块,以及在五个干预信托基金中进行的替代两小时的在职会阴修复讲习班。
助产士对进行会阴修复的能力和信心的感知水平。
在五个干预信托基金中,接受教育干预后,能够以更高水平的能力进行会阴修复的助产士数量显著增加(P<.006)。在比较信托基金中,差异无统计学意义(P<.535)。此外,为助产士提供的教育计划增加了在直接监督下自信地参与会阴修复的高级学生助产士的数量,当他们认为导师在进行该程序时具有信心和能力时。
会阴修复教育计划可以显著提高助产士在评估和管理会阴创伤和修复时的能力和信心感知水平。
能力和专业知识是复杂的现象,数据提供了更多的深入了解工作场所学习的复杂性,以及影响临床决策的多种因素,如人员短缺、时间限制和能够指导、监督和评估会阴修复能力的助产士人数不足。培训资金是未来实践发展可持续性的基础。