Syrjänen K, Shabalova I, Naud P, Kozachenko V, Derchain S, Zakharchenko S, Roteli-Martins C, Nerovjna R, Longatto-Filho A, Kljukina L, Tatti S, Branovskaja M, Hammes L S, Branca M, Grunjberga V, Eržen M, Juschenko A, Costa S, Sarian L, Podistov J, Syrjänen S
Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Int J STD AIDS. 2011 Jun;22(6):315-23. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2009.009365.
To make feasible future clinical trials with new-generation human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, novel virological surrogate endpoints of progressive disease have been proposed, including high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) persistence for six months (6M+) or 12 months (12M+). The risk estimates (relative risks [RRs]) of these 'virological endpoints' are influenced by several variables, not yet validated adequately. We compared the impact of three referent groups: (i) HPV-negative, (ii) HPV-transient, (iii) HPV-mixed outcome on the risk estimates for 6M+ or 12M+ HR-HPV persistence as predictors of progressive disease. Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the strength of 6M+ and 12M+ HR-HPV persistence with disease progression to squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 1+, CIN2+, CIN/SIL endpoints, comparing three optional reference categories (i)-(iii) in a prospective sub-cohort of 1865 women from the combined New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (NIS) and Latin American Screening (LAMS) studies cohort (n = 15,301). The RRs of these viral endpoints as predictors of progressive disease are affected by the length of viral persistence (6M+ or 12M+) and the surrogate endpoint (SIL, CIN1, CIN2, CIN/SIL). Most dramatic is the effect of the referent group used in risk estimates, with the HPV-negative referent group giving the highest and most consistent RRs for both 6M+ and 12M+ viral persistence, irrespective of which surrogate is used. In addition to deciding on whether to use 6M+ or 12M+ persistence criteria, and cytological, histological or combined surrogate endpoints, one should adopt the HPV-negative referent group as the gold standard in all future studies using viral persistence as the surrogate endpoint of progressive disease.
为使新一代人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗的未来临床试验切实可行,已提出了疾病进展的新型病毒学替代终点,包括高危型HPV(HR-HPV)持续六个月(6M+)或十二个月(12M+)。这些“病毒学终点”的风险估计值(相对风险[RRs])受若干变量影响,这些变量尚未得到充分验证。我们比较了三个参照组的影响:(i)HPV阴性,(ii)HPV短暂感染,(iii)HPV混合结果,对6M+或12M+ HR-HPV持续存在作为疾病进展预测指标的风险估计值的影响。广义估计方程模型用于估计6M+和12M+ HR-HPV持续存在与疾病进展至鳞状上皮内病变(SILs)、宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)1级及以上、CIN2+、CIN/SIL终点之间的关联强度,在来自前苏联新独立国家(NIS)和拉丁美洲筛查(LAMS)研究队列合并队列(n = 15,301)的1865名女性的前瞻性亚队列中比较三个可选参照类别(i)-(iii)。这些病毒学终点作为疾病进展预测指标的RRs受病毒持续时间(6M+或12M+)和替代终点(SIL、CIN1、CIN2、CIN/SIL)影响。风险估计中使用的参照组的影响最为显著,HPV阴性参照组对于6M+和12M+病毒持续存在给出的RRs最高且最一致,无论使用哪种替代指标。除了决定是否使用6M+或12M+持续标准以及细胞学、组织学或联合替代终点外,在所有未来使用病毒持续存在作为疾病进展替代终点的研究中,应采用HPV阴性参照组作为金标准。