• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性脑卒中后 72 小时内神经源性口咽性吞咽困难的预后预测。

Prediction of outcome in neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia within 72 hours of acute stroke.

机构信息

Department of Neurology & Stroke Unit, HELIOS General Hospital Aue, Dresden University of Technology, Aue, Germany.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012 Oct;21(7):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.01.004
PMID:21683618
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stroke is the most frequent cause of neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia (NOD). In the acute phase of stroke, the frequency of NOD is greater than 50% and, half of this patient population return to good swallowing within 14 days while the other half develop chronic dysphagia. Because dysphagia leads to aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, and in-hospital mortality, it is important to pay attention to swallowing problems. The question arises if a prediction of severe chronic dysphagia is possible within the first 72 hours of acute stroke.

METHODS

On admission to the stroke unit, all stroke patients were screened for swallowing problems by the nursing staff within 2 hours. Patients showing signs of aspiration were included in the study (n = 114) and were given a clinical swallowing examination (CSE) by the swallowing/speech therapist within 24 hours and a swallowing endoscopy within 72 hours by the physician. The primary outcome of the study was the functional communication measure (FCM) of swallowing (score 1-3, tube feeding dependency) on day 90.

RESULTS

The grading system with the FCM swallowing and the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) in the first 72 hours was tested in a multivariate analysis for its predictive value for tube feeding-dependency on day 90. For the FCM level 1 to 3 (P < .0022) and PAS level 5 to 8 (P < .00001), the area under the curve (AUC) was 72.8% and showed an odds ratio of 11.8 (P < .00001; 95% confidence interval 0.036-0.096), achieving for the patient a 12 times less chance of being orally fed on day 90 and therefore still being tube feeding-dependent.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that signs of aspiration in the first 72 hours of acute stroke can predict severe swallowing problems on day 90. Consequently, patients should be tested on admission to a stroke unit and evaluated with established dysphagia scales to prevent aspiration pneumonia and malnutrition. A dysphagia program can lead to better communication within the stroke unit team to initiate the appropriate diagnostics and swallowing therapy as soon as possible.

摘要

背景

中风是神经源性口咽吞咽困难(NOD)最常见的原因。在中风的急性期,NOD 的频率大于 50%,其中一半患者在 14 天内恢复良好吞咽,而另一半则发展为慢性吞咽困难。由于吞咽困难会导致吸入性肺炎、营养不良和院内死亡率增加,因此关注吞咽问题非常重要。问题是是否可以在急性中风的前 72 小时内预测严重的慢性吞咽困难。

方法

在中风病房入院时,护理人员在 2 小时内对所有中风患者进行吞咽问题筛查。出现吸入迹象的患者被纳入研究(n=114),并在 24 小时内由吞咽/言语治疗师进行临床吞咽检查(CSE),在 72 小时内由医生进行吞咽内镜检查。研究的主要结局是第 90 天的功能性沟通测量(FCM)吞咽评分(1-3 分,管饲依赖)。

结果

在多变量分析中,我们测试了前 72 小时内 FCM 吞咽和渗透-吸入量表(PAS)的分级系统对第 90 天管饲依赖的预测价值。对于 FCM 水平 1-3(P<.0022)和 PAS 水平 5-8(P<.00001),曲线下面积(AUC)为 72.8%,并显示出 11.8 的优势比(P<.00001;95%置信区间 0.036-0.096),这意味着患者第 90 天经口进食的机会减少 12 倍,仍然依赖管饲。

结论

我们的结论是,急性中风前 72 小时内的吸入迹象可以预测第 90 天的严重吞咽问题。因此,应在中风病房入院时对患者进行测试,并使用已建立的吞咽困难量表进行评估,以预防吸入性肺炎和营养不良。吞咽障碍计划可以促进中风病房团队内更好的沟通,以便尽快启动适当的诊断和吞咽治疗。

相似文献

1
Prediction of outcome in neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia within 72 hours of acute stroke.急性脑卒中后 72 小时内神经源性口咽性吞咽困难的预后预测。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012 Oct;21(7):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
2
Towards a basic endoscopic assessment of swallowing in acute stroke - development and evaluation of a simple dysphagia score.急性卒中吞咽功能的基础内镜评估——一种简单吞咽困难评分的制定与评价
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(1):41-7. doi: 10.1159/000135652. Epub 2008 May 30.
3
Using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale to predict dysphagia in acute ischemic stroke.采用国立卫生研究院卒中量表预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者的吞咽困难。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33(6):501-7. doi: 10.1159/000336240. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
4
The secretion severity rating scale: a potentially useful tool for management of acute-phase fasting stroke patients.分泌严重程度评分量表:急性空腹脑卒中患者管理的一种潜在有用工具。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011 May-Jun;20(3):183-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.11.015. Epub 2010 Jul 10.
5
Acoustic analysis of swallowing sounds: a new technique for assessing dysphagia.吞咽声音的声学分析:一种评估吞咽困难的新技术。
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Jul;41(8):639-45. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0384.
6
Elderly age, bilateral lesions, and severe neurological deficit are correlated with stroke-associated pneumonia.高龄、双侧病变和严重神经功能缺损与卒中相关性肺炎相关。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Mar;23(3):484-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 8.
7
Bedside assessment of swallowing: a useful screening tool for dysphagia in an acute geriatric ward.床边吞咽评估:急性老年病房吞咽困难的有效筛查工具。
Singapore Med J. 2000 Aug;41(8):376-81.
8
Speech-language pathologist-led fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: functional outcomes for patients after stroke.由言语语言病理学家主导的吞咽功能纤维内镜评估:中风患者的功能结局
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Mar;23(3):e195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.09.031. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
9
Predictors of survival after severe dysphagic stroke.严重吞咽困难性中风后的生存预测因素。
J Neurol. 2005 Dec;252(12):1510-6. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0906-9. Epub 2005 Sep 5.
10
Dysphagia in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: Early Dysphagia Screening May Reduce Stroke-Related Pneumonia and Improve Stroke Outcomes.急性缺血性脑卒中患者的吞咽困难:早期吞咽困难筛查可能减少与卒中相关的肺炎并改善卒中结局。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;42(1-2):81-9. doi: 10.1159/000445299. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress on rehabilitation programs for dysphagia in patients with ischemic stroke: A Narrative review.缺血性脑卒中患者吞咽困难康复方案的研究进展:叙述性综述
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):2144-2151. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.7.9657.
2
The Role of Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) in International Stroke Teams: A Systematic Review.言语和语言治疗师(SLTs)在国际卒中团队中的作用:一项系统综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70062. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70062.
3
[Postextubation dysphagia in intensive care unit : Epidemiology, clinical course, and management].
[重症监护病房拔管后吞咽困难:流行病学、临床病程及管理]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 May;120(4):355-365. doi: 10.1007/s00063-025-01266-9. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
4
Factors associated with oropharyngeal dysphagia and unsuccessful nasogastric tube removal after endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke.血管内血栓切除术治疗前循环卒中后口咽吞咽困难及鼻胃管拔除失败的相关因素。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Dec;15(6):1669-1681. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01069-9. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
5
Apraisal of the diagnostic value of the gag reflex in patients with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia.评估咽反射在神经源性口咽吞咽困难患者中的诊断价值。
Biomedica. 2024 May 30;44(2):155-167. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.7009.
6
Predictors for Failed Removal of Nasogastric Tube in Patients With Brain Insult.脑损伤患者鼻胃管拔除失败的预测因素
Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Jun;48(3):220-227. doi: 10.5535/arm.230011. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
7
Prediction of Oral Intake at Discharge with Early Assessment of Swallowing Function within 24 h after Admission: A Retrospective Cohort Study.入院 24 小时内早期评估吞咽功能对出院时口服摄食量的预测:一项回顾性队列研究。
Dysphagia. 2024 Dec;39(6):1163-1170. doi: 10.1007/s00455-024-10699-x. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
8
Crushed Tablet Administration for Patients with Dysphagia and Enteral Feeding: Challenges and Considerations.压碎片剂给药在吞咽困难和肠内喂养患者中的应用:挑战与考虑。
Drugs Aging. 2023 Oct;40(10):895-907. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01056-y. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
9
Demographic and clinical factors associated with recovery of poststroke dysphagia: A meta-analysis.与脑卒中后吞咽障碍恢复相关的人口学和临床因素:一项荟萃分析。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jun;13(6):e3033. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3033. Epub 2023 May 15.
10
Can non-swallowing function assessment predict nasogastric tube removal in patients with poststroke dysphagia? A clinical study.吞咽功能未受损的评估能否预测中风后吞咽困难患者鼻胃管的拔除?一项临床研究。
Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 1;13:984707. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.984707. eCollection 2022.