Suppr超能文献

帕金森病相关痴呆:应用运动障碍学会工作组标准。

Dementia associated with Parkinson's disease: applying the Movement Disorder Society Task Force criteria.

机构信息

Alzheimer Disease Research Unit, CIEN Foundation, Carlos III Institute of Health, Alzheimer Center Reina Sofia Foundation, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2011 Sep;17(8):621-4. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.05.017. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic criteria and procedures for dementia in Parkinson's disease (PDD) have been proposed by a Movement Disorders Society Task Force (MDS-TF). The objective of this study was to explore the utility of the new MDS-TF criteria and procedures in clinical practice.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety nine PD patients (36.5% with PDD as per MDFS-TF criteria; 33.1% according the DSM-IV) were included in the study. A variety of standardized motor, cognitive, psychiatric, and global severity measures were administered. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to determine the variables producing discrepancy between the MDS-TF and DSM-IV criteria for PDD and the clinical features that distinguished false negative cases.

RESULTS

Agreement between MDS-TF and DSM-IV criteria was substantial (87.3%; kappa = 0.72), but the DSM-IV criteria failed to identify 22% of patients fulfilling MDS-TF criteria. False negative cases were older and had more severe motor symptoms but less psychosis than those true non-demented PD. False positives had less severe motor symptoms than true PDD, although the difference did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the MDS-TF criteria are more sensitive than the DSM-IV for a diagnosis of PDD. Old age, absence of psychiatric symptoms, and severe motor impairment can hinder the diagnosis of PDD.

摘要

背景

帕金森病(PDD)的诊断标准和程序由运动障碍协会工作组(MDS-TF)提出。本研究的目的是探讨新的 MDS-TF 标准和程序在临床实践中的应用。

方法

研究纳入 299 例 PD 患者(36.5% 根据 MDS-TF 标准为 PDD;33.1% 根据 DSM-IV)。采用多种标准化的运动、认知、精神和整体严重程度测量方法进行评估。建立多元逻辑回归模型,以确定 MDS-TF 和 DSM-IV 诊断 PDD 标准之间差异的变量以及区分假阴性病例的临床特征。

结果

MDS-TF 和 DSM-IV 标准之间的一致性较高(87.3%;kappa=0.72),但 DSM-IV 标准未能识别符合 MDS-TF 标准的 22%患者。假阴性病例比真正非痴呆 PD 患者年龄更大,运动症状更严重,但精神病症状更少。假阳性病例的运动症状比真正的 PDD 更轻,尽管差异没有达到统计学意义。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,与 DSM-IV 相比,MDS-TF 标准对 PDD 的诊断更敏感。年龄较大、无精神症状和严重运动障碍可能会阻碍 PDD 的诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验