Suppr超能文献

帕金森病伴痴呆的运动障碍学会推荐诊断标准的临床验证。

Clinical validation of Movement Disorder Society-recommended diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease with dementia.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Sciences, Section of Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorders, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.

出版信息

Mov Disord. 2012 Feb;27(2):248-53. doi: 10.1002/mds.24059. Epub 2011 Dec 9.

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the Movement Disorders Society (MDS) Task Force-proposed screening checklist for detecting Parkinson's disease dementia (PD-D) in relation to full neuropsychological testing. An MDS Task Force has proposed diagnostic procedures for PD-D, which have not been fully validated against more extensive neuropsychological testing. PD subjects were recruited from 2 specialty centers. A neuropsychologist evaluated them for dementia as part of routine clinical care. Independent clinical neurologists administered the MDS PD-D screening checklist. Diagnosis of PD-D by the 2 methods was compared. Ninety-one PD subjects had a mean age of 66.3 (SD = 9.7) years and a mean PD duration of 8.8 (SD = 6.1) years. Seven subjects (7.7%) met all 8 screening checklist criteria from the MDS PD-D screening tool and were classified as probable PD-D. Fifteen (16.5%) subjects were classified as PD-D by full neuropsychological assessment. The screening checklist showed 100% specificity, but only 46.7% sensitivity, for diagnosing PD-D compared to the full neuropsychological assessment. PD-D cases missed by the PD-D screening tool were largely due to 2 checklist items that were not endorsed (absence of depression and Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] scores <26). There was moderate agreement between these 2 methods for determination of PD-D (kappa = 0.59, P < .001). The MDS-PD-D screening checklist is highly accurate for detecting PD-D if all items are endorsed. However, for cases that do not meet these criteria, full neuropsychological testing is needed to differentiate PD-D from milder cognitive impairment. Revision of the checklist by altering or eliminating the 2 problematic checklist items may improve sensitivity.

摘要

这项工作的目的是评估运动障碍学会(MDS)工作组提出的筛查清单,以检测帕金森病痴呆(PD-D)与全面神经心理学测试的关系。MDS 工作组提出了 PD-D 的诊断程序,但尚未通过更广泛的神经心理学测试充分验证。PD 患者从 2 个专科中心招募。神经心理学家对他们进行痴呆评估,作为常规临床护理的一部分。独立的临床神经科医生则对 MDS PD-D 筛查清单进行了评估。比较了这两种方法诊断 PD-D 的结果。91 名 PD 患者的平均年龄为 66.3(SD=9.7)岁,平均 PD 病程为 8.8(SD=6.1)年。7 名患者(7.7%)满足 MDS PD-D 筛查工具中的所有 8 项筛查清单标准,被归类为可能的 PD-D。15 名患者(16.5%)根据全面神经心理学评估被归类为 PD-D。与全面神经心理学评估相比,筛查清单在诊断 PD-D 方面的特异性为 100%,但敏感性仅为 46.7%。PD-D 筛查工具漏诊的 PD-D 病例主要是由于 2 项筛查清单项目未被认可(无抑郁和简易精神状态检查[MMSE]评分<26)。这两种方法在确定 PD-D 方面具有中度一致性(kappa=0.59,P<.001)。如果所有项目均被认可,MDS-PD-D 筛查清单对检测 PD-D 非常准确。然而,对于不符合这些标准的病例,需要进行全面的神经心理学测试以区分 PD-D 与轻度认知障碍。通过改变或消除这 2 个有问题的筛查清单项目,可以提高敏感性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验