Am J Bot. 1998 Jun;85(6):741.
The system of classification of the Polemoniaceae currently in use was published by Grant in 1959. Much new evidence concerning relationships in the family has been obtained by numerous workers since 1959, and the old system is in need of revision. A revised system down to the genus level, based on conventional and unconventional characters, including molecular evidence, is presented here. Nineteen genera are grouped into eight tribes and two subfamilies. Three new tribes are described: Acanthogilieae, Loeselieae, and Leptodactyloneae. Several genera are transferred to new groups. The phylogeny of the family is discussed in the light of both the older and new evidence. The approach used in constructing both the 1959 and new systems is that of evolutionary systematics. Two recent (1996, 1997) family-wide surveys of cpDNA and rDNA use cladistic methods of analysis to arrive at sets of major groups. Some of this molecular evidence has been adopted for the present revised system. However, much incongruence still exists between the new sets of clades, on the one hand, and the present revised system or the still-viable parts of the 1959 system on the other hand. The incongruences call for an examination and comparison of the contrasting methods of evolutionary systematics and molecular cladistics. A fundamental flaw in the 1996 and 1997 treatments is the attempt to classify plants on the basis of single-gene gene trees.
目前使用的 Polemoniaceae 分类系统是由 Grant 于 1959 年出版的。自 1959 年以来,许多研究人员已经获得了许多关于该科内关系的新证据,旧系统需要修订。基于传统和非常规特征(包括分子证据),在此提出了一个修订后的系统,下至属级。将 19 个属分为 8 个族和两个亚科。描述了三个新族:Acanthogilieae、Loeselieae 和 Leptodactyloneae。一些属被转移到新的组中。根据旧的和新的证据,讨论了该科的系统发育。构建 1959 年系统和新系统所使用的方法是进化系统学。最近(1996 年、1997 年)对 cpDNA 和 rDNA 的全家族调查采用了分支分析方法来确定主要群体。分子证据的一些已经被用于本修订系统。然而,新的分支群与本修订系统或 1959 年系统仍然可行的部分之间仍然存在很大的不一致。这些不一致之处需要对进化系统学和分子分支分析的对比方法进行检查和比较。1996 年和 1997 年的处理方法的一个根本缺陷是试图基于单基因基因树对植物进行分类。