Miakotnykh V S
Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 1990;90(5):13-8.
As many as 635 patients were referred to the Antiepileptic Center for counselling and examination. They had been diagnosed to suffer from epilepsy or the epileptic syndrome within the period from several days to 3 years since the moment of the first paroxysms. In 70 patients, the epileptic nature of the paroxysms was not confirmed, i. e. the primary diagnosis turned out to be erroneous. The paroxysms estimated at first as epileptic were systematized. The basis was formed by vegetative or vegetative visceral paroxysms of different character and gravity, which went, in the majority of cases, with loss of consciousness and, in rare cases, with unmarked convulsive component. 10 patients subjected to the EEG manifested fairly moderate epileptiform alterations and only one patient demonstrated paroxysmal diffuse epileptic activity. The author provides a number of clinical differential diagnostic criteria for the nonepileptic paroxysmal states that occurred for the first time. It is indicated that the EEG, the biochemical and other paraclinical methods of the diagnosis made in the initial disease stage may turn out abortive.
多达635名患者被转介到抗癫痫中心进行咨询和检查。自首次发作起,他们在几天至3年的时间内被诊断患有癫痫或癫痫综合征。在70名患者中,发作的癫痫性质未得到证实,即最初的诊断被证明是错误的。最初被估计为癫痫发作的情况被系统化了。其基础是由不同性质和严重程度的植物性或植物性内脏发作构成,在大多数情况下,这些发作伴随着意识丧失,在极少数情况下,伴有不明显的抽搐成分。10名接受脑电图检查的患者表现出相当中度的癫痫样改变,只有1名患者表现出阵发性弥漫性癫痫活动。作者提供了一些首次出现的非癫痫性发作状态的临床鉴别诊断标准。指出在疾病初始阶段进行的脑电图、生化及其他辅助临床诊断方法可能会失败。