• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用工作记忆控制对伤害性刺激的注意力。

Controlling attention to nociceptive stimuli with working memory.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020926. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0020926
PMID:21687745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3110248/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because pain often signals the occurrence of potential tissue damage, a nociceptive stimulus has the capacity to involuntarily capture attention and take priority over other sensory inputs. Whether distraction by nociception actually occurs may depend upon the cognitive characteristics of the ongoing activities. The present study tested the role of working memory in controlling the attentional capture by nociception.

METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Participants performed visual discrimination and matching tasks in which visual targets were shortly preceded by a tactile distracter. The two tasks were chosen because of the different effects the involvement of working memory produces on performance, in order to dissociate the specific role of working memory in the control of attention from the effect of general resource demands. Occasionally (i.e. 17% of the trials), tactile distracters were replaced by a novel nociceptive stimulus in order to distract participants from the visual tasks. Indeed, in the control conditions (no working memory), reaction times to visual targets were increased when the target was preceded by a novel nociceptive distracter as compared to the target preceded by a frequent tactile distracter, suggesting attentional capture by the novel nociceptive stimulus. However, when the task required an active rehearsal of the visual target in working memory, the novel nociceptive stimulus no longer induced a lengthening of reaction times to visual targets, indicating a reduction of the distraction produced by the novel nociceptive stimulus. This effect was independent of the overall task demands.

CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE

Loading working memory with pain-unrelated information may reduce the ability of nociceptive input to involuntarily capture attention, and shields cognitive processing from nociceptive distraction. An efficient control of attention over pain is best guaranteed by the ability to maintain active goal priorities during achievement of cognitive activities and to keep pain-related information out of task settings.

摘要

背景

由于疼痛通常预示着潜在组织损伤的发生,伤害性刺激具有无意识地吸引注意力并优先于其他感觉输入的能力。伤害性刺激是否会分散注意力可能取决于正在进行的活动的认知特征。本研究测试了工作记忆在控制伤害性刺激引起的注意力捕获中的作用。

方法和主要发现

参与者执行视觉辨别和匹配任务,其中视觉目标短暂地被触觉干扰物所先行。选择这两个任务是因为工作记忆的参与对表现产生不同的影响,以便将工作记忆在注意力控制中的特定作用与一般资源需求的影响区分开来。偶尔(即 17%的试验),触觉干扰物会被新的伤害性刺激取代,以分散参与者对视觉任务的注意力。事实上,在对照条件下(没有工作记忆),与目标前有常见触觉干扰物相比,当目标前有新的伤害性干扰物时,对视觉目标的反应时间会增加,这表明新的伤害性刺激引起了注意力的捕获。然而,当任务需要在工作记忆中主动复述视觉目标时,新的伤害性刺激不再导致对视觉目标的反应时间延长,表明新的伤害性刺激产生的干扰减少。这种效果与整体任务需求无关。

结论和意义

用与疼痛无关的信息加载工作记忆可能会降低伤害性输入无意识地吸引注意力的能力,并保护认知处理免受疼痛干扰。通过在进行认知活动时保持积极的目标优先级并将与疼痛相关的信息排除在任务设置之外,可以最好地保证对疼痛的有效注意力控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f530/3110248/98b5031c4be8/pone.0020926.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f530/3110248/b2b765da52f2/pone.0020926.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f530/3110248/e42de6a91203/pone.0020926.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f530/3110248/211b51725ec5/pone.0020926.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f530/3110248/98b5031c4be8/pone.0020926.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f530/3110248/b2b765da52f2/pone.0020926.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f530/3110248/e42de6a91203/pone.0020926.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f530/3110248/211b51725ec5/pone.0020926.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f530/3110248/98b5031c4be8/pone.0020926.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Controlling attention to nociceptive stimuli with working memory.用工作记忆控制对伤害性刺激的注意力。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020926. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
2
Shielding cognition from nociception with working memory.用工作记忆屏蔽伤害感受以保护认知。
Cortex. 2013 Jul-Aug;49(7):1922-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.014. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
3
The role of working memory in the attentional control of pain.工作记忆在疼痛注意控制中的作用。
Pain. 2011 Feb;152(2):453-459. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.024.
4
Working memory contents revive the neglected, but suppress the inhibited.工作记忆内容会使被忽视的信息重现,但会抑制被抑制的信息。
Cognition. 2015 Dec;145:116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
5
Working memory and visual discrimination distraction tasks improve cold pressor pain tolerance in children.工作记忆和视觉辨别干扰任务可提高儿童冷加压疼痛耐受力。
Health Psychol. 2020 Jan;39(1):10-20. doi: 10.1037/hea0000789. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
6
Effects of a force production task and a working memory task on pain perception.力产生任务和工作记忆任务对疼痛感知的影响。
J Pain. 2013 Nov;14(11):1492-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
7
Effects of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNICs) on the sensory-discriminative dimension of pain perception.弥漫性有害抑制控制(DNICs)对疼痛感知的感觉辨别维度的影响。
Pain. 1989 Feb;36(2):231-238. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90028-6.
8
Disruption of working memory and contralateral delay activity by nociceptive stimuli is modulated by task demands.痛觉刺激会破坏工作记忆和对侧延迟活动,其可被任务需求调节。
Pain. 2022 Jul 1;163(7):1335-1345. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002517. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
9
Preserved distraction analgesia but greater impact of pain on task performance in older adults compared with younger subjects.与年轻受试者相比,老年受试者保留了分散注意力镇痛作用,但疼痛对任务表现的影响更大。
Pain Med. 2023 Jul 5;24(7):818-828. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac207.
10
Sequential neural processes of tactile-visual crossmodal working memory.触觉-视觉跨模态工作记忆的序列神经过程。
Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):299-309. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.058. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The causal role of brain circuits in osteoarthritis pain.脑回路在骨关节炎疼痛中的因果作用。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2025 May;21(5):261-274. doi: 10.1038/s41584-025-01234-9. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
2
Pain-sensorimotor interactions: New perspectives and a new model.疼痛-感觉运动相互作用:新观点与新模型。
Neurobiol Pain. 2024 Jan 20;15:100150. doi: 10.1016/j.ynpai.2024.100150. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
3
Parabrachial Nucleus Activity in Nociception and Pain in Awake Mice.觉醒小鼠伤害感受和疼痛中的臂旁核活动。

本文引用的文献

1
Dishabituation of laser-evoked EEG responses: dissecting the effect of certain and uncertain changes in stimulus modality.激光诱发脑电图反应的脱敏:剖析刺激方式的确定和不确定变化的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2822-37. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21609. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
2
The role of working memory in the attentional control of pain.工作记忆在疼痛注意控制中的作用。
Pain. 2011 Feb;152(2):453-459. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.024.
3
Where is my pain?我的疼痛在哪里?
J Neurosci. 2023 Aug 2;43(31):5656-5667. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0587-23.2023. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
4
Parabrachial nucleus activity in nociception and pain in awake mice.清醒小鼠中臂旁核在伤害感受和疼痛中的活动
bioRxiv. 2023 May 29:2023.03.22.533230. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.22.533230.
5
No evidence for an effect of selective spatial attention on the development of secondary hyperalgesia: A replication study.无证据表明选择性空间注意力对继发性痛觉过敏的发展有影响:一项重复研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 3;16:997230. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.997230. eCollection 2022.
6
Attention Bias to Pain Words Comes Early and Cognitive Load Matters: Evidence from an ERP Study on Experimental Pain.注意偏向对疼痛词汇的出现较早,认知负荷很重要:来自实验性疼痛的 ERP 研究的证据。
Neural Plast. 2021 Oct 31;2021:9940889. doi: 10.1155/2021/9940889. eCollection 2021.
7
Management of dental anxiety via distraction technique.通过分心技术管理牙科焦虑症。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Apr 1;13(4):e350-e356. doi: 10.4317/jced.57660. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Neural correlates of working memory's suppression of aversive olfactory distraction effects.工作记忆抑制厌恶嗅觉分心效应的神经相关物。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Oct;15(5):2254-2268. doi: 10.1007/s11682-020-00419-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
9
An incremental dual-task paradigm to investigate pain attenuation by task difficulty, affective content and threat value.递增双任务范式研究任务难度、情感内容和威胁值对疼痛的抑制作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 9;13(11):e0207023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207023. eCollection 2018.
10
Enhancement of pain inhibition by working memory with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.通过工作记忆与左侧背外侧前额叶皮层的阳极经颅直流电刺激增强疼痛抑制。
J Physiol Sci. 2018 Nov;68(6):825-836. doi: 10.1007/s12576-018-0598-4. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):467-468. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.011. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
4
The pain matrix reloaded: a salience detection system for the body.疼痛矩阵再加载:身体的突显检测系统。
Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Jan;93(1):111-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
5
A multisensory investigation of the functional significance of the "pain matrix".多模态研究“疼痛矩阵”的功能意义。
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2237-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.084. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
6
Stimulus novelty, and not neural refractoriness, explains the repetition suppression of laser-evoked potentials.刺激新颖性而非神经不应期,解释了激光诱发电位的重复抑制现象。
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Oct;104(4):2116-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.01088.2009. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
7
Performance-dependent inhibition of pain by an executive working memory task.执行工作记忆任务对疼痛的绩效依赖性抑制。
Pain. 2010 Apr;149(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.027. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
8
Keeping pain in mind: a motivational account of attention to pain.铭记疼痛:关注疼痛的动机解释。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Feb;34(2):204-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Jan 28.
9
Involuntary orienting of attention to nociceptive events: neural and behavioral signatures.对伤害性事件的非自愿注意定向:神经和行为特征。
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Oct;102(4):2423-34. doi: 10.1152/jn.00372.2009. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
10
A neurocognitive model of attention to pain: behavioral and neuroimaging evidence.一种疼痛注意力的神经认知模型:行为学和神经影像学证据。
Pain. 2009 Aug;144(3):230-232. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.020. Epub 2009 Apr 18.