Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Oct;37(5):1369-82. doi: 10.1037/a0024265.
Observers respond faster when the task-relevant perceptual dimension (e.g., color) repeats across consecutive trials relative to when it changes. Such dimension repetition benefits (DRBs) occur in different tasks, from singleton feature search to feature discrimination of a stimulus presented on its own. Here, we argue that the DRBs observed in different tasks originate from distinct mechanisms: preselective weighting of dimension-specific feature contrast signals and, respectively, postselective stimulus processing. The multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis predicts significant DRBs across trials of different tasks that share the same weighting mechanism, but not across tasks involving different mechanisms. Experiments 1, 2, and 3 examined DRBs across localization and detection tasks (both involving feature contrast computations); across detection and identification tasks (which presumably involved different weighting systems); and across identification and discrimination tasks (both involving stimulus identification). As expected, significant DRBs were observed across different tasks in Experiments 1 and 3, but not in Experiment 2. These findings support the multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis.
当任务相关的感知维度(例如颜色)在连续试验中重复出现而不是变化时,观察者的反应速度会更快。这种维度重复优势(DRB)出现在不同的任务中,从单特征搜索到单独呈现刺激的特征辨别。在这里,我们认为不同任务中观察到的 DRB 源自不同的机制:维度特定特征对比信号的预选择加权,以及分别是后选择的刺激处理。多重加权系统假说预测,在具有相同加权机制的不同任务的试验中会出现显著的 DRB,但在涉及不同机制的任务中不会出现。实验 1、2 和 3 分别在定位和检测任务(都涉及特征对比计算)、检测和识别任务(据推测涉及不同的加权系统)以及识别和辨别任务(都涉及刺激识别)中检验了 DRB。正如预期的那样,在实验 1 和 3 中观察到了不同任务之间的显著 DRB,但在实验 2 中没有观察到。这些发现支持了多重加权系统假说。