Department of Nursing, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Sep;20(17-18):2425-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03578.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
The aim of this study was to explore the thinking strategies and clinical reasoning processes registered nurses use during simulated care planning for malnutrition and pressure ulcers in nursing home care.
Clinical reasoning is an essential component of nursing practice. Registered nurses' thinking strategies and clinical reasoning have received limited attention in nursing science. Further research is needed to understand registered nurses' clinical reasoning, especially for prevention of malnutrition and pressure ulcers as they are important quality indicators of resident care in nursing homes.
A qualitative explorative design was used with a think-aloud interview technique.
The transcribed verbalisations were analysed with qualitative deductive content analysis. Data were collected during six months in 2007-2008 from 30 registered nurses at nine nursing homes in Norway.
The registered nurses used a variety of thinking strategies, but there were differences in the frequency of use of the different strategies. The three most commonly used thinking strategies were 'making choices', 'forming relationships' and 'drawing conclusions'. None of the nurses performed a structured risk assessment of malnutrition or pressure ulcers. Registered nurses started with assessing data from the scenarios, but after a short and elementary assessment they moved directly to planning.
Many different thinking strategies were used in registered nurses' clinical reasoning for prevention of malnutrition and pressure ulcers. The thinking strategy 'making choices' was most commonly used and registered nurses' main focus in their reasoning was on planning nursing interventions.
This study showed that most of the registered nurses go directly to planning when reasoning clinically about residents in nursing homes. A lack of systematic risk assessments was identified. The insight gained from this study can be used to recommend improvements in tools designed for nursing homes to support the registered nurses.
本研究旨在探讨注册护士在养老院护理中模拟营养不良和压疮护理计划时使用的思维策略和临床推理过程。
临床推理是护理实践的重要组成部分。注册护士的思维策略和临床推理在护理科学中受到的关注有限。需要进一步研究以了解注册护士的临床推理,特别是对于预防营养不良和压疮,因为它们是养老院居民护理的重要质量指标。
使用有声思维的定性探索性设计和访谈技术。
对转录的言语进行定性演绎内容分析。数据于 2007 年至 2008 年六个月期间在挪威的九家养老院的 30 名注册护士中收集。
注册护士使用了多种思维策略,但不同策略的使用频率存在差异。使用最多的三种思维策略是“做出选择”、“建立关系”和“得出结论”。没有护士对营养不良或压疮进行结构化风险评估。注册护士首先评估情景中的数据,但在进行简短和基本的评估后,他们直接开始规划。
注册护士在预防营养不良和压疮的临床推理中使用了许多不同的思维策略。“做出选择”是最常用的思维策略,注册护士在推理中的主要重点是规划护理干预措施。
本研究表明,大多数注册护士在对养老院居民进行临床推理时直接进行规划。确定了缺乏系统风险评估的问题。从这项研究中获得的见解可用于建议改进为养老院设计的工具,以支持注册护士。