Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Dec;18(6):1126-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01707.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
RATIONALE, AIM AND OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of health care practitioners using objective clinical tools with sound psychometric properties. There is also a need for researchers to improve their reporting of the validity and reliability results of these clinical tools. Therefore, to promote the use of valid and reliable tools or tests for clinical evaluation, this paper reports on the development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the psychometric properties of objective clinical tools.
A five-step process was followed to develop the new critical appraisal tool: (1) preliminary conceptual decisions; (2) defining key concepts; (3) item generation; (4) assessment of face validity; and (5) formulation of the final tool.
The new critical appraisal tool consists of 13 items, of which five items relate to both validity and reliability studies, four items to validity studies only and four items to reliability studies. The 13 items could be scored as 'yes', 'no' or 'not applicable'.
This critical appraisal tool will aid both the health care practitioner to critically appraise the relevant literature and researchers to improve the quality of reporting of the validity and reliability of objective clinical tools.
目前缺乏使用具有良好心理测量特性的客观临床工具的医疗保健从业者。研究人员也需要提高其对这些临床工具的有效性和可靠性结果的报告。因此,为了促进对临床评估有效的和可靠的工具或测试的使用,本文报告了一种新的评价工具的开发,以评估客观临床工具的心理测量特性。
新的评价工具的开发遵循了五个步骤:(1)初步概念决策;(2)定义关键概念;(3)项目生成;(4)评估表面有效性;以及(5)制定最终工具。
新的评价工具由 13 个项目组成,其中 5 个项目涉及有效性和可靠性研究,4 个项目仅涉及有效性研究,4 个项目仅涉及可靠性研究。这 13 个项目可以评为“是”、“否”或“不适用”。
该评价工具将帮助医疗保健从业者批判性地评估相关文献,并帮助研究人员提高客观临床工具的有效性和可靠性报告的质量。