Vulnerable Population Unit, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1):41-52.e42. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.007.
Frequent users of emergency departments (EDs) are a relatively small group of vulnerable patients accounting for a disproportionally high number of ED visits. Our objective is to perform a systematic review of the type and effectiveness of interventions to reduce the number of ED visits by frequent users.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, the Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science for randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, interrupted time series, and controlled and noncontrolled before-and-after studies describing interventions targeting adult frequent users of EDs. Primary outcome of interest was the reduction in ED use. We also explored costs analyses and various clinical (alcohol and drug use, psychiatric symptoms, mortality) and social (homelessness, insurance status, social security support) outcomes.
We included 11 studies (3 randomized controlled trials, 2 controlled and 6 noncontrolled before-and-after studies). Heterogeneity in both study designs and definitions of frequent users precluded meta-analyses of the results. The most studied intervention was case management (n=7). Only 1 of 3 randomized controlled trials showed a significant reduction in ED use compared with usual care. Six of the 8 before-and-after studies reported a significant reduction in ED use, and 1 study showed a significant increase. ED cost reductions were demonstrated in 3 studies. Social outcomes such as reduction of homelessness were favorable in 3 of 3 studies, and clinical outcomes trended toward positive results in 2 of 3 studies.
Interventions targeting frequent users may reduce ED use. Case management, the most frequently described intervention, reduced ED costs and seemed to improve social and clinical outcomes. It appears to be beneficial to patients and justifiable for hospitals to implement case management for frequent users in the framework of a clear and consensual definition of frequent users and standardized outcome measures.
急诊科(ED)的高频使用者是一个相对较小的弱势群体,他们占 ED 就诊人数的比例过高。我们的目的是对减少高频使用者 ED 就诊次数的干预措施的类型和效果进行系统评价。
我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsychINFO、Cochrane 图书馆和 ISI Web of Science 中搜索了针对 ED 高频使用者的成人干预措施的随机对照试验、非随机对照试验、中断时间序列以及对照和非对照前后研究。主要结果是 ED 使用减少。我们还探讨了成本分析以及各种临床(酒精和药物使用、精神症状、死亡率)和社会(无家可归、保险状况、社会保障支持)结局。
我们纳入了 11 项研究(3 项随机对照试验、2 项对照和 6 项非对照前后研究)。由于研究设计和高频使用者的定义存在差异,因此无法对结果进行荟萃分析。研究最多的干预措施是病例管理(n=7)。仅 3 项随机对照试验中的 1 项与常规护理相比,ED 使用显著减少。8 项前后研究中有 6 项报告 ED 使用显著减少,1 项研究显示 ED 使用显著增加。3 项研究显示 ED 成本降低。3 项研究均显示社会结局(如减少无家可归)有利,2 项研究显示临床结局呈积极趋势。
针对高频使用者的干预措施可能会减少 ED 使用。病例管理是最常描述的干预措施,它降低了 ED 成本,似乎改善了社会和临床结局。对于患者来说,这似乎是有益的,并且在明确和共识性的高频使用者定义以及标准化的结局测量的框架内,对医院来说,实施病例管理是合理的。