Suppr超能文献

左心室舒张末期压力与急性冠状动脉综合征。

Left ventricular end diastolic pressure and acute coronary syndromes.

机构信息

Departamento de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitário, Faculdade de Medicina de Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011 Aug;97(2):100-10. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000074. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data is lacking in the literature regarding the prognostic impact of left ventricular-end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) across acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

OBJECTIVE

To assess LVEDP and its prognostic implications in ACS patients.

METHODS

Prospective, longitudinal and continuous study of 1329 ACS patients from a single center between 2004 and 2006. Diastolic function was determined by LVEDP. Population was divided in two groups: A - LVEDP < 26.5 mmHg (n = 449); group B - LVEDP ≥ 26.5 mmHg (n = 226).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups with respect to risk factors for cardiovascular disease, medical history and medical therapy during admission. In group A, patients with non-ST elevation ACS were more frequent, as well as normal coronary angiograms. In-hospital mortality was similar between groups, but one-year survival was higher in group A patients (96.9 vs 91.2%, log rank p = 0.002). On a multivariate Cox regression model, a LVEDP ≥ 26.5 mmHg (HR 2.45, 95%CI 1.05 - 5.74) remained an independent predictor for one-year mortality, when adjusted for age, LV systolic ejection fraction, ST elevation ACS, peak troponin, admission glycemia, and diuretics at 24 hours. Also, a LVEDP ≥ 26.5 mmHg was an independent predictor for a future readmission due to congestive HF (HR 6.65 95%CI 1.74 - 25.5).

CONCLUSION

In our selected population, LVEDP had a significant prognostic influence.

摘要

背景

关于急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的左心室舒张末期压(LVEDP)的预后影响,文献中数据缺乏。

目的

评估 ACS 患者的 LVEDP 及其预后意义。

方法

对 2004 年至 2006 年期间单中心的 1329 例 ACS 患者进行前瞻性、纵向和连续性研究。通过 LVEDP 确定舒张功能。人群分为两组:A 组 - LVEDP<26.5mmHg(n=449);B 组 - LVEDP≥26.5mmHg(n=226)。

结果

两组间在心血管疾病危险因素、病史和入院期间的药物治疗方面无显著差异。在 A 组中,非 ST 段抬高 ACS 患者更为常见,且冠状动脉造影正常。两组间院内死亡率相似,但 A 组患者的一年生存率更高(96.9%比 91.2%,对数秩检验 p=0.002)。多变量 Cox 回归模型显示,在校正年龄、LV 收缩射血分数、ST 段抬高 ACS、肌钙蛋白峰值、入院血糖和 24 小时内利尿剂后,LVEDP≥26.5mmHg(HR 2.45,95%CI 1.05-5.74)仍是一年死亡率的独立预测因素。此外,LVEDP≥26.5mmHg 也是因充血性心力衰竭(HF)再次入院的独立预测因素(HR 6.65,95%CI 1.74-25.5)。

结论

在我们选择的人群中,LVEDP 具有显著的预后影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验