Departamento de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitário, Faculdade de Medicina de Coimbra, Portugal.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011 Aug;97(2):100-10. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000074. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
Data is lacking in the literature regarding the prognostic impact of left ventricular-end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) across acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
To assess LVEDP and its prognostic implications in ACS patients.
Prospective, longitudinal and continuous study of 1329 ACS patients from a single center between 2004 and 2006. Diastolic function was determined by LVEDP. Population was divided in two groups: A - LVEDP < 26.5 mmHg (n = 449); group B - LVEDP ≥ 26.5 mmHg (n = 226).
There were no significant differences between groups with respect to risk factors for cardiovascular disease, medical history and medical therapy during admission. In group A, patients with non-ST elevation ACS were more frequent, as well as normal coronary angiograms. In-hospital mortality was similar between groups, but one-year survival was higher in group A patients (96.9 vs 91.2%, log rank p = 0.002). On a multivariate Cox regression model, a LVEDP ≥ 26.5 mmHg (HR 2.45, 95%CI 1.05 - 5.74) remained an independent predictor for one-year mortality, when adjusted for age, LV systolic ejection fraction, ST elevation ACS, peak troponin, admission glycemia, and diuretics at 24 hours. Also, a LVEDP ≥ 26.5 mmHg was an independent predictor for a future readmission due to congestive HF (HR 6.65 95%CI 1.74 - 25.5).
In our selected population, LVEDP had a significant prognostic influence.
关于急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的左心室舒张末期压(LVEDP)的预后影响,文献中数据缺乏。
评估 ACS 患者的 LVEDP 及其预后意义。
对 2004 年至 2006 年期间单中心的 1329 例 ACS 患者进行前瞻性、纵向和连续性研究。通过 LVEDP 确定舒张功能。人群分为两组:A 组 - LVEDP<26.5mmHg(n=449);B 组 - LVEDP≥26.5mmHg(n=226)。
两组间在心血管疾病危险因素、病史和入院期间的药物治疗方面无显著差异。在 A 组中,非 ST 段抬高 ACS 患者更为常见,且冠状动脉造影正常。两组间院内死亡率相似,但 A 组患者的一年生存率更高(96.9%比 91.2%,对数秩检验 p=0.002)。多变量 Cox 回归模型显示,在校正年龄、LV 收缩射血分数、ST 段抬高 ACS、肌钙蛋白峰值、入院血糖和 24 小时内利尿剂后,LVEDP≥26.5mmHg(HR 2.45,95%CI 1.05-5.74)仍是一年死亡率的独立预测因素。此外,LVEDP≥26.5mmHg 也是因充血性心力衰竭(HF)再次入院的独立预测因素(HR 6.65,95%CI 1.74-25.5)。
在我们选择的人群中,LVEDP 具有显著的预后影响。