• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不只是母性主义:美国福利政策中的婚姻和父权

Not just maternalism: marriage and fatherhood in American welfare policy.

出版信息

Soc Polit. 2011;18(1):24-51. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxr003.

DOI:10.1093/sp/jxr003
PMID:21692243
Abstract

The United States' 1996 welfare reforms are often interpreted as a historical break in transitioning from supporting motherhood to commodifiying women's labor. However, this cannot account for welfare reform's emphasis upon heterosexual marriage and fatherhood promotion. The paper traces continuities and shifts in over a century of familial regulation through American welfare policy, specifying the place of marriage promotion within welfare policy. Up until 1996, families were key sites of intervention through which the American welfare state was erected, especially through single women as mothers - not wives. However, as of the 1960s, concern with African American men's "failed" familial commitments turned policymakers toward concern over marriage promotion for women and men. While marriage "disincentives" for aid recipients were lifted in the 1960s, the 1996 reforms structured a new form of nuclear family governance actively promoting marriage rooted in, but distinct from, the previous. Given the historical absence of welfare policies available to poor men, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families' (TANF) marriage promotion policies have positioned poor women as nodes connecting the state to poor men, simultaneously structuring poor women as breadwinners, mothers, and wives. Recent welfare reform has also started to target poor men directly, especially in fatherhood and marriage promotion initiatives. The article highlights how, in addition to workfare policies, marriage promotion is a neoliberal policy shifting risk to the shoulders of the poor, aiming to produce "strong families" for the purposes of social security.

摘要

美国 1996 年的福利改革通常被解读为从支持母性向商品化女性劳动力转变的历史转折点。然而,这并不能说明福利改革对异性婚姻和父权制的强调。本文通过美国福利政策追溯了一个多世纪以来家庭监管的连续性和转变,具体说明了婚姻促进在福利政策中的地位。直到 1996 年,家庭一直是美国福利国家建立的干预重点,尤其是单身母亲——而不是妻子。然而,自 20 世纪 60 年代以来,人们开始关注非裔美国男性“失败”的家庭承诺,这促使政策制定者转而关注女性和男性的婚姻促进。虽然援助接受者的婚姻“激励”在 20 世纪 60 年代被取消,但 1996 年的改革构建了一种新的核心家庭治理形式,积极促进基于但不同于以前的婚姻。鉴于贫困男性缺乏福利政策,《有工作的家庭援助法案》(TANF)的婚姻促进政策将贫困女性定位为将国家与贫困男性联系起来的节点,同时将贫困女性构建为养家糊口者、母亲和妻子。最近的福利改革也开始直接针对贫困男性,特别是在促进父亲和婚姻的倡议方面。本文强调了除了工作福利政策之外,婚姻促进也是一种新自由主义政策,将风险转移到穷人的肩上,旨在为社会保障目的培养“强大的家庭”。

相似文献

1
Not just maternalism: marriage and fatherhood in American welfare policy.不只是母性主义:美国福利政策中的婚姻和父权
Soc Polit. 2011;18(1):24-51. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxr003.
2
Consuming relief: food stamps and the new welfare of the New Deal.消费救济:食品券与新政时期的新福利
J Am Hist. 2011;97(4):1001-022. doi: 10.1093/jahist/jaq067.
3
The uneven patterning of welfare benefits at the twilight of AFDC: assessing the influence of institutions, race, and citizen preferences.对家庭补助计划(AFDC)末期福利金分配不均的研究:评估制度、种族和公民偏好的影响
Sociol Q. 2011;52(3):376-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01211.x.
4
Household and market in suffragette discourse, 1903-14.1903 - 1914年参政论者话语中的家庭与市场
Eur Leg Towar New Paradig. 2001;6(2):189-99. doi: 10.1080/10848770120031378.
5
["Can there be no exceptional status for exceptional people?" The law on registered partnership: its history and implications].["非凡之人难道不应享有特殊地位吗?”注册伴侣关系法:其历史与影响]
Den Jyske Hist. 2002(98-99):189-206.
6
[Liberalization of divorce: a Nordic model?].[离婚自由化:北欧模式?]
Hist Tidsskr. 2001;80(3):283-301.
7
Whose mothers? Generational difference, war, and the Nazi cult of motherhood.谁的母亲?代际差异、战争与纳粹的母亲崇拜。
J Womens Hist. 2001;12(4):138-63.
8
"One large secure, solid background": Melanie Klein and the origins of the British welfare state.“一个庞大的安全、稳固的背景”:梅兰妮·克莱因与英国福利国家的起源
Psychoanal Hist. 1999;1(2):136-54. doi: 10.3366/pah.1999.1.2.136.
9
The "liberal state": civil society and social welfare in nineteenth-century England.“自由国家”:19世纪英国的公民社会与社会福利
J Hist Sociol. 2002;15(1):114-9. doi: 10.1111/1467-6443.00173.
10
[Swiss women who had become foreigners by marriage and their children during World War II: a search in the Vaud cantonal archives].[二战期间因婚姻成为外国人的瑞士女性及其子女:在沃州档案馆的探寻]
Schweiz Z Gesch. 2001;51(1):18-45.

引用本文的文献

1
First-birth Timing, Marital History, and Women's Health at Midlife.首次生育时间、婚姻史与中年女性健康。
J Health Soc Behav. 2015 Dec;56(4):514-33. doi: 10.1177/0022146515609903.