Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1156, USA.
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jan;38(1):53-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2011.044586. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
The charge of complicity has been raised in debates over the ethics of fetal tissue transplantation and embryonic stem cell research. However, the applicability of the concept of complicity to these types of research is neither clear nor uncontroversial. This article discusses the historical case of Julius Hallervorden, a distinguished German neuropathologist who conducted research on brains of mentally handicapped patients killed in the context of the Nazi 'euthanasia' programme. It is argued that this case constitutes a paradigm of complicity in research that is useful in assessing complicity in contemporary research ethics.
在关于胎儿组织移植和胚胎干细胞研究的伦理道德的辩论中,共谋指控已经提出。然而,共谋这一概念对这些类型的研究的适用性既不清楚也不无争议。本文讨论了德国杰出神经病理学家朱利叶斯·哈勒沃登的历史案例,他在纳粹“安乐死”计划的背景下对智障患者的大脑进行了研究。有人认为,这种情况构成了共谋研究的范例,有助于评估当代研究伦理中的共谋问题。