• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干和/或三血管病变:SYNTAX 试验 3 年随访结果。

Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2011 Sep;32(17):2125-34. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr213. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr213
PMID:21697170
Abstract

AIMS

Long-term randomized comparisons of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in left main coronary (LM) disease and/or three-vessel disease (3VD) patients have been limited. This analysis compares 3-year outcomes in LM and/or 3VD patients treated with CABG or PCI with TAXUS Express stents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

SYNTAX is an 85-centre randomized clinical trial (n= 1800). Prospectively screened, consecutive LM and/or 3VD patients were randomized if amenable to equivalent revascularization using either technique; if not, they were entered into a registry. Patients in the randomized cohort will continue to be followed for 5 years. At 3 years, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE: death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization; CABG 20.2% vs. PCI 28.0%, P< 0.001], repeat revascularization (10.7 vs. 19.7%, P< 0.001), and MI (3.6 vs. 7.1%, P= 0.002) were elevated in the PCI arm. Rates of the composite safety endpoint (death/stroke/MI 12.0 vs. 14.1%, P= 0.21) and stroke alone (3.4 vs. 2.0%, P= 0.07) were not significantly different between treatment groups. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event rates were not significantly different between arms in the LM subgroup (22.3 vs. 26.8%, P= 0.20) but were higher with PCI in the 3VD subgroup (18.8 vs. 28.8%, P< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

At 3 years, MACCE was significantly higher in PCI- compared with CABG-treated patients. In patients with less complex disease (low SYNTAX scores for 3VD or low/intermediate terciles for LM patients), PCI is an acceptable revascularization, although longer follow-up is needed to evaluate these two revascularization strategies.

摘要

目的

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗左主干(LM)病变和/或三血管病变(3VD)患者的长期随机比较有限。本分析比较了接受 CABG 或 PCI 治疗并使用 TAXUS Express 支架的 LM 和/或 3VD 患者的 3 年结果。

方法和结果

SYNTAX 是一项 85 中心的随机临床试验(n=1800)。连续筛选出适合两种技术进行等效血运重建的 LM 和/或 3VD 患者,如果不适合,则将其纳入登记册。随机队列中的患者将继续随访 5 年。3 年时,主要不良心脑血管事件[MACCE:死亡、卒、心肌梗死(MI)和再次血运重建;CABG 为 20.2% vs. PCI 为 28.0%,P<0.001]、再次血运重建(10.7% vs. 19.7%,P<0.001)和 MI(3.6% vs. 7.1%,P=0.002)在 PCI 组中升高。治疗组之间复合安全终点(死亡/卒/MI 为 12.0% vs. 14.1%,P=0.21)和单独卒(3.4% vs. 2.0%,P=0.07)的发生率无显著差异。LM 亚组中,两组之间的 MACCE 发生率无显著差异(22.3% vs. 26.8%,P=0.20),但 3VD 亚组中 PCI 组更高(18.8% vs. 28.8%,P<0.001)。

结论

3 年时,与 CABG 治疗相比,PCI 治疗患者的 MACCE 显著更高。在疾病不太复杂的患者中(3VD 的 SYNTAX 评分较低或 LM 患者的评分较低/中三分之一),PCI 是一种可接受的血运重建方法,尽管需要更长时间的随访来评估这两种血运重建策略。

相似文献

1
Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.比较冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干和/或三血管病变:SYNTAX 试验 3 年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Sep;32(17):2125-34. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr213. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
2
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较:SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.
3
Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial.糖尿病患者复杂冠状动脉疾病的治疗:SYNTAX 试验比较旁路手术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 5 年结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt017. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
4
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在三支病变合并左主干病变患者中的比较:随机、临床 SYNTAX 试验的 5 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):629-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60141-5.
5
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
6
Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study.新型经皮冠状动脉血运重建术治疗初发三血管病变患者的临床结局:SYNTAX II 研究 1 年结果。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 7;38(42):3124-3134. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx512.
7
Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery trial.在紫杉醇药物涂层支架与心脏搭桥术联合治疗左主干病变研究中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变患者的 5 年结果。
Circulation. 2014 Jun 10;129(23):2388-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006689. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
8
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干狭窄患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895.
9
Angiographic outcomes following stenting or coronary artery bypass surgery of the left main coronary artery: fifteen-month outcomes from the synergy between PCI with TAXUS express and cardiac surgery left main angiographic substudy (SYNTAX-LE MANS).左主干冠状动脉支架置入术或冠状动脉旁路移植术后的血管造影结果:紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏手术左主干血管造影亚研究(SYNTAX-LE MANS)的 PCI 与 TAXUS express 之间协同作用的 15 个月结果。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Oct 30;7(6):670-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I6A109.
10
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.

引用本文的文献

1
Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes and Heart Failure-A Narrative Review.糖尿病合并心力衰竭患者的心肌血运重建——一项叙述性综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 5;26(7):3398. doi: 10.3390/ijms26073398.
2
Comparison of Thick Biolimus A9-Eluting Stent and Thin Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent in Multi-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中厚壁生物雷帕霉素A9洗脱支架与薄壁佐他莫司洗脱支架的比较。
Korean Circ J. 2025 May;55(5):396-407. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0101. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
3
Coronary angiography: a review of the state of the art and the evolution of angiography in cardio therapeutics.
冠状动脉造影术:心血管治疗领域的技术现状及血管造影术的发展综述。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 25;11:1468888. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1468888. eCollection 2024.
4
The effect of coronary revascularization treatment timing on mortality in patients with stable ischemic heart disease in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省稳定型缺血性心脏病患者冠状动脉血运重建治疗时机对死亡率的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0303222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303222. eCollection 2024.
5
Building and Optimizing the Interdisciplinary Heart Team.构建和优化跨学科心脏团队。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Jul 14;2(6Part A):101067. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101067. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec.
6
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Complex Coronary Artery Disease: Long-term Clinical Outcomes from a High-volume Center.复杂冠状动脉疾病中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较:来自高容量中心的长期临床结果
Heart Views. 2023 Jul-Sep;24(3):141-147. doi: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_116_22. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
7
Long-term outcome of percutaneous or surgical revascularization with and without prior stroke in patients with three-vessel disease.三支血管病变患者经皮或外科血管重建术的长期预后:有无既往卒中的情况
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022 Aug 28;19(8):583-593. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.08.001.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠心病患者的比较效果:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 23;14(9):e29505. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29505. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Using machine learning to aid treatment decision and risk assessment for severe three-vessel coronary artery disease.使用机器学习辅助重度三支冠状动脉疾病的治疗决策和风险评估。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022 May 28;19(5):367-376. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.05.005.
10
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft in patients with STEMI and unprotected left main stem disease: A systematic review & meta-analysis.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并无保护左主干病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Apr 25;40:101041. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101041. eCollection 2022 Jun.