Gao Fan, Carlton William, Kapp Susan
Department of Health Care Sciences, School of Health Professions, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390–9091, USA.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011 Jun;35(2):181-9. doi: 10.1177/0309364611409617.
Articulated or hinged ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) allow more range of motion. However, quantitative investigation on articulated AFO is still sparse.
The objective of the study was to quantitatively investigate effects of alignment and joint types on mechanical properties of the thermoplastic articulated AFO.
Tamarack dorsiflexion assist flexure joints with three durometers (75, 85 and 95) and free motion joint were tested. The AFO joint was aligned with the center of the motor shaft (surrogate ankle joint), 10 mm superior, inferior, anterior and posterior with respect to the motor shaft center.
The AFO was passively moved from 20° plantar flexion to 15° dorsiflexion at a speed of 10°/s using a motorized device. Mechanical properties including index of hysteresis, passive resistance torque and quasi-static stiffness (at neutral, 5°, 10° and 15° in plantar flexion) were quantified.
Significant effects of joint types and joint alignment on the mechanical properties of an articulated thermoplastic AFO were revealed. Specifically, center alignment showed minimum resistance and stiffness while anterior and posterior alignment showed significantly higher resistance and stiffness. The dorsiflexion assist torques at neutral position ranged from 0.69 ± 0.09 to 1.88 ± 0.10 Nm.
Anterior and posterior alignment should be avoided as much as possible.
The current study suggested that anterior and posterior alignment be avoided as much as possible in clinical practice due to potential skin irritation and increase in stress around the ankle joint.
关节式或铰链式踝足矫形器(AFO)可提供更大的活动范围。然而,关于关节式AFO的定量研究仍然很少。
本研究的目的是定量研究对线和关节类型对热塑性关节式AFO力学性能的影响。
测试了具有三种硬度(75、85和95)的Tamarack背屈辅助挠性关节和自由运动关节。AFO关节与电机轴中心(替代踝关节)对齐,相对于电机轴中心在上方、下方、前方和后方10毫米处。
使用电动装置以10°/秒的速度将AFO从20°跖屈被动移动到15°背屈。对包括滞后指数、被动阻力矩和准静态刚度(在跖屈0°、5°、10°和15°时)等力学性能进行量化。
揭示了关节类型和关节对线对关节式热塑性AFO力学性能的显著影响。具体而言,中心对线显示出最小的阻力和刚度,而前后对线显示出显著更高的阻力和刚度。中立位时的背屈辅助扭矩范围为0.69±0.09至1.88±0.10牛米。
应尽可能避免前后对线。
当前研究表明,在临床实践中应尽可能避免前后对线,因为这可能会引起皮肤刺激并增加踝关节周围的应力。