Buljovčić Z
Regulatory Expert Innnovative Medicine, PharmaLex GmbH, Joseph-Meyer-Str. 13-15, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2011 Jul;54(7):831-8. doi: 10.1007/s00103-011-1310-5.
On 30 December 2008, the Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 on advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) entered into force. Herewith the first EU-wide regulatory framework for ATMPs was established. It requires a central marketing authorisation application to the EMA (European Medicinal Agency). This new framework especially changes the code of regulatory practice for tissue engineered products (TEPs), as no registration procedure had been previously required for autologous TEPs. This also meant that no clinical proof of efficacy achieved by a pivotal clinical trial was necessary. Difficulties and their background as well as the vast requirements for product development that have to be addressed by small companies within a very short time frame are presented. Hereby, it is obvious that regulatory experience which is required to identify and implement the resulting implications was not in place yet and still had to be established. The lack of regulatory experience also resulted in difficulties with scientific advice preparation, expectations toward regulatory agencies, consultants, and transformation of regulatory requirements. Addressing the regulatory requirements within the transition period is even more difficult for entrepreneurs with products which are assigned for indications resulting in complex challenges to the trial design. Due to the enormous time pressure to generate data and due to the implied financial pressure, different adaptation strategies are evolving. In Germany the "hospital exemption" according to §4b AMG (German Medicinal Products Law) is of major importance. A reorientation toward acellular products and a slow down in development of new ATMP products is expected.
2008年12月30日,关于高级治疗用医药产品(ATMPs)的欧盟法规(EC)1394/2007生效。据此,首个全欧盟范围的ATMPs监管框架得以确立。它要求向欧洲药品管理局(EMA)提交集中上市许可申请。这一新框架尤其改变了组织工程产品(TEPs)的监管实践准则,因为此前自体TEPs无需注册程序。这也意味着无需通过关键临床试验来证明疗效。文中介绍了相关困难及其背景,以及小公司在极短时间内必须应对的产品开发的巨大要求。由此可见,识别和落实由此产生的影响所需的监管经验尚不具备,仍有待确立。监管经验的缺乏还导致在准备科学建议、对监管机构和顾问的期望以及转化监管要求方面存在困难。对于那些产品被指定用于某些适应症从而给试验设计带来复杂挑战的创业者来说,在过渡期内满足监管要求更加困难。由于生成数据的巨大时间压力以及隐含的财务压力,不同的适应策略正在形成。在德国,根据德国药品法第4b条的“医院豁免”至关重要。预计将重新转向无细胞产品,并放缓新型ATMP产品的开发。