Unit of Pharmacoepidemiology, Clinical Pharmacology Department, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):322-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318217a68e.
Different mechanisms have been proposed to explain spinal anesthesia failure even after LA injection into the subarachnoid space. The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to assess the incidence of spinal anesthesia failure, excluding technical problems, and then to suggest independent factors leading to failure.
Consecutive spinal anesthetic procedures performed in 21 centers were included. Exclusion criteria were contraindications to spinal anesthesia and technical difficulties. Primary end point was the calculation of failure incidence. Factors leading to spinal anesthesia failure were investigated.
One thousand two hundred fourteen spinals were included. Failure rate, reported by 17 of 21 centers, was 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-4.2). A total failure (no sensory block) was noted in 41% of the 39 cases of failed block. Patients in the failure group were younger as compared with patients in the success group. Using backward logistic regression, factors associated with failure were the number of puncture attempts at 3 or more (odds ratio [OR], 2.86; 95% CI, 1.20-6.79) and the absence of the use of an adjuvant medication with the local anesthetic injected (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.2-4.5). Age older than 70 years (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.20-0.93) was associated with a decrease of failure.
The results of this study showed that the incidence of spinal anesthesia failure was 3.2%. The number of puncture attempts at 3 or more and the absence of adjuvant medication associated with local anesthetic were independent factors associated with the increased risk of failure. The failure of spinal anesthesia was rare in patients older than 70 years.
即使将局部麻醉剂注入蛛网膜下腔,也有不同的机制被提出用于解释脊麻失败。本前瞻性多中心研究旨在评估脊麻失败的发生率,排除技术问题,并提出导致失败的独立因素。
纳入 21 个中心进行的连续脊麻操作。排除标准为脊麻禁忌证和技术困难。主要终点是计算失败发生率。调查导致脊麻失败的因素。
共纳入 1214 例脊麻。17 个中心报告的失败率为 3.2%(95%置信区间[CI],2.2-4.2)。在 39 例失败阻滞中,总失败(无感觉阻滞)占 41%。失败组患者比成功组患者年轻。采用向后逻辑回归,与失败相关的因素为 3 次或以上的穿刺尝试(比值比[OR],2.86;95%CI,1.20-6.79)和局部麻醉剂中不使用辅助药物(OR,2.32;95%CI,1.2-4.5)。年龄大于 70 岁(OR,0.3;95%CI,0.20-0.93)与失败风险降低相关。
本研究结果显示脊麻失败的发生率为 3.2%。3 次或以上的穿刺尝试和局部麻醉剂中不使用辅助药物是与失败风险增加相关的独立因素。年龄大于 70 岁的患者脊麻失败罕见。