Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Leukemia. 2011 Nov;25(11):1728-38. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.154. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
Core-binding factor (CBF) leukemias, characterized by translocations t(8;21) or inv(16)/t(16;16) targeting the CBF, constitute acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subgroups with favorable prognosis. However, about 40% of patients relapse and the current classification system does not fully reflect this clinical heterogeneity. Previously, gene expression profiling (GEP) revealed two distinct CBF leukemia subgroups displaying significant outcome differences and identified apoptotic signaling, MAPKinase signaling and chemotherapy-resistance mechanisms among the most significant differentially regulated pathways. We now tested different inhibitors of the respective pathways in a cell line model (six cell lines reflecting the CBF subgroup-specific gene expression alterations), and found apoptotic signaling to be differentiating between the CBF subgroup models. In accordance, primary samples from newly diagnosed CBF AML patients (n=23) also showed differential sensitivity to in vitro treatment with a Smac mimetic such as BV6, an antagonist of inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins, and ABT-737, a BCL2 inhibitor. Furthermore, GEP revealed the BV6-resistant cases to resemble the previously identified unfavorable CBF subgroup. Thus, our current findings show deregulated IAP expression and apoptotic signaling to differentiate clinically relevant CBF subgroups, which were independent of known molecular markers, thereby providing a starting point for novel therapeutic approaches.
核心结合因子(CBF)白血病,其特征为靶向 CBF 的易位 t(8;21)或 inv(16)/t(16;16),构成具有良好预后的急性髓系白血病(AML)亚组。然而,约 40%的患者会复发,而当前的分类系统并未完全反映这种临床异质性。此前,基因表达谱(GEP)揭示了两个截然不同的 CBF 白血病亚组,其预后差异显著,并确定了凋亡信号、MAPKinase 信号和化疗耐药机制是差异调节通路中的关键机制。我们现在在细胞系模型(六个反映 CBF 亚组特异性基因表达改变的细胞系)中测试了不同的通路抑制剂,并发现凋亡信号能够区分 CBF 亚组模型。相应地,新诊断的 CBF AML 患者的原发性样本(n=23)也显示出对 Smac 类似物(如凋亡抑制蛋白(IAP)拮抗剂 BV6 和 BCL2 抑制剂 ABT-737)的体外治疗具有不同程度的敏感性。此外,GEP 显示 BV6 耐药病例类似于先前确定的不利 CBF 亚组。因此,我们目前的研究结果表明,IAP 表达失调和凋亡信号能够区分具有临床意义的 CBF 亚组,而与已知的分子标志物无关,从而为新的治疗方法提供了起点。