• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

带有实质偏见的语音学习:关于软腭化的实验和计算研究。

Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, UCLA.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep 10;30(5):945-82. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_89.

DOI:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_89
PMID:21702842
Abstract

There is an active debate within the field of phonology concerning the cognitive status of substantive phonetic factors such as ease of articulation and perceptual distinctiveness. A new framework is proposed in which substance acts as a bias, or prior, on phonological learning. Two experiments tested this framework with a method in which participants are first provided highly impoverished evidence of a new phonological pattern, and then tested on how they extend this pattern to novel contexts and novel sounds. Participants were found to generalize velar palatalization (e.g., the change from [k] as in keep to [t?∫S] as in cheap) in a way that accords with linguistic typology, and that is predicted by a cognitive bias in favor of changes that relate perceptually similar sounds. Velar palatalization was extended from the mid front vowel context (i.e., before [e] as in cape) to the high front vowel context (i.e., before [i] as in keep), but not vice versa. The key explanatory notion of perceptual similarity is quantified with a psychological model of categorization, and the substantively biased framework is formalized as a conditional random field. Implications of these results for the debate on substance, theories of phonological generalization, and the formalization of similarity are discussed.

摘要

在音韵学领域,关于实体语音因素(如发音容易度和感知区别度)的认知地位存在着激烈的争论。本文提出了一个新的框架,其中实体因素作为音韵学习的偏向或先验因素。通过一种方法,利用该框架进行了两项实验,该方法首先向参与者提供了关于新语音模式的高度简化的证据,然后测试他们如何将该模式扩展到新的语境和新的声音。研究发现,参与者以一种符合语言类型学的方式,以及一种有利于感知相似声音变化的认知偏向,来推广软腭化(例如,从[k] 如 keep 到[t?∫S] 如 cheap)。软腭化从中前元音语境(即在[e] 如 cape 之前)扩展到高前元音语境(即在[i] 如 keep 之前),反之则不然。感知相似性的关键解释概念通过类别心理学模型进行量化,而受实体因素偏向的框架则形式化为条件随机场。讨论了这些结果对实体争论、语音概括理论和相似性形式化的影响。

相似文献

1
Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization.带有实质偏见的语音学习:关于软腭化的实验和计算研究。
Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep 10;30(5):945-82. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_89.
2
Evidence for a learning bias against saltatory phonological alternations.关于对跳跃式音系交替存在学习偏见的证据。
Cognition. 2014 Jan;130(1):96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
3
Biased generalization of newly learned phonological alternations by 12-month-old infants.12个月大婴儿对新学语音交替的偏向性泛化。
Cognition. 2014 Oct;133(1):85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
4
Implications of an exemplar-theoretic model of phoneme genesis: a velar palatalization case study.音素生成的样例理论模型的启示:一个软腭腭化的案例研究。
Lang Speech. 2014 Mar;57(Pt 1):3-41. doi: 10.1177/0023830913478926.
5
Learning metathesis: Evidence for syllable structure constraints.学习音位转换:音节结构限制的证据。
J Mem Lang. 2017 Feb;92:142-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
6
Interaction of phonological biases and frequency in learning a probabilistic language pattern.语音偏向与频率在概率语言模式学习中的相互作用。
Cognition. 2022 Sep;226:105170. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105170. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
7
On the back of the tongue: dorsal sounds in Australian languages.在舌背:澳大利亚语言中的鼻音。
Phonetica. 2004 Jan-Mar;61(1):22-52. doi: 10.1159/000078661.
8
A gestural account of the velar fricative in Navajo.纳瓦霍语中软腭擦音的手势描述。
Lab Phonol. 2012 May;3(1):195-210. doi: 10.1515/lp-2012-0011.
9
Word learning and phonetic processing in preschool-age children.学龄前儿童的词汇学习和语音处理。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Jan;108(1):25-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
10
Priming vs. rhyming: orthographic and phonological representations in the left and right hemispheres.启动效应与押韵:左右半球的正字法和语音表征
Brain Cogn. 2008 Nov;68(2):193-203. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling rapid language learning by distilling Bayesian priors into artificial neural networks.通过将贝叶斯先验知识提炼到人工神经网络中来模拟快速语言学习。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 20;16(1):4676. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59957-y.
2
Are your random effects normal? A simulation study of methods for estimating whether subjects or items come from more than one population by examining the distribution of random effects in mixed-effects logistic regression.你的随机效应是正态的吗?通过检查混合效应逻辑回归中随机效应的分布来估计被试或项目是否来自多个总体的方法的模拟研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5557-5587. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02287-y. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Are Human Learners Capable of Learning Arbitrary Language Structures.
人类学习者能够学习任意的语言结构吗?
Brain Sci. 2023 Jan 21;13(2):181. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020181.
4
Neural evidence suggests phonological acceptability judgments reflect similarity, not constraint evaluation.神经证据表明,语音可接受性判断反映的是相似性,而不是约束评估。
Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105322. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105322. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
5
Generalization to Novel Consonants: Place Versus Voice.辅音的泛化:音位对比语音
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Dec;51(6):1283-1309. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09897-1. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
6
Phonetically Grounded Structural Bias in Learning Tonal Alternations.学习声调交替中基于语音的结构偏差
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 26;12:705766. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.705766. eCollection 2021.
7
Monotone Quantifiers Emerge via Iterated Learning.单调量词通过迭代学习出现。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Aug;45(8):e13027. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13027.
8
Generative Adversarial Phonology: Modeling Unsupervised Phonetic and Phonological Learning With Neural Networks.生成对抗语音学:使用神经网络对无监督语音和音系学习进行建模
Front Artif Intell. 2020 Jul 8;3:44. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00044. eCollection 2020.
9
Developmental Constraints on Learning Artificial Grammars with Fixed, Flexible and Free Word Order.学习具有固定、灵活和自由词序的人工语法的发展限制
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 17;8:1816. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01816. eCollection 2017.
10
Learning metathesis: Evidence for syllable structure constraints.学习音位转换:音节结构限制的证据。
J Mem Lang. 2017 Feb;92:142-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jul 8.