Suppr超能文献

为脑卒中患者制定一套功能性层级平衡简式量表。

Development of a set of functional hierarchical balance short forms for patients with stroke.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, E-Da Hospital and I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Jul;92(7):1119-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.02.012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a set of 3 hierarchical balance short forms (HBSF; containing sitting, standing, and stepping forms) to measure balance function in patients with stroke.

DESIGN

First, we developed the HBSF, based on a previous data set, with each short form containing 6 items. Second, we examined the psychometric properties and efficiency of the HBSF.

SETTING

Six teaching hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with stroke (n=764) for the first part of this study; inpatients and outpatients (n=85) for the second part of this study.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We used the item bank (9 sitting-related, 14 standing-related, and 13 stepping-related items) from the Balance Computerized Adaptive Test to develop the HBSF. Both the HBSF and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) were administered to patients, to determine the concurrent validity and time needed for administration of both measures. Each patient was assessed by 1 of the 3 short forms selected by a rater.

RESULTS

The reliability of the HBSF was relatively high (reliability coefficients, .94-.95). The scores of the HBSF were highly correlated with those of the BBS (Spearman ρ=.80-.91), supporting the concurrent validity of the HBSF. The average time needed to administer the HBSF was 122 seconds (ie, about 40% of that for the BBS).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide sufficient evidence that the HBSF is an efficient, reliable, valid, and practical way to measure balance function in patients with stroke.

摘要

目的

开发一套包含坐、站、跨步三种形式的 3 级平衡简化量表(HBSF),用于测量脑卒中患者的平衡功能。

设计

首先,我们基于先前的数据组开发了 HBSF,每个简化量表包含 6 个项目。其次,我们评估了 HBSF 的心理测量学特性和效率。

地点

六所教学医院。

参与者

本研究的第一部分纳入了 764 例脑卒中患者;第二部分纳入了 85 例住院和门诊患者。

干预

不适用。

主要观察指标

我们使用平衡计算机化自适应测试的项目库(9 个与坐相关、14 个与站相关、13 个与跨步相关的项目)开发了 HBSF。我们向患者同时施测 HBSF 和 Berg 平衡量表(BBS),以确定这两种测量方法的同时效度和所需的施测时间。由评估者选择其中的 3 种简化量表之一对每位患者进行评估。

结果

HBSF 的可靠性相对较高(可靠性系数为.94-.95)。HBSF 评分与 BBS 评分高度相关(Spearman ρ=.80-.91),支持 HBSF 的同时效度。施测 HBSF 的平均用时为 122 秒(即大约是 BBS 的 40%)。

结论

我们的研究结果充分证明 HBSF 是一种有效、可靠、有效且实用的测量脑卒中患者平衡功能的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验