• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阳性粪便潜血试验结果后的肿瘤检出率不受内镜中心影响:一项基于人群的研究。

Neoplasia detection rates after positive fecal occult blood test results are not affected by endoscopy center: a population-based study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Pontchaillou Hospital, Rennes, France.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1179.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1179
PMID:21704812
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We previously showed a significant variability in adenoma detection among colonoscopists who were participating in a mass screening program. The reasons for such variability remain largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To study intercenter variations in neoplasia detection.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Secondary analyses of colonoscopy findings from the 2 first rounds of a French screening program: logistic regressions and repeated-measures analyses of variance.

MATERIAL

A total of 3487 colonoscopies performed by all 19 endoscopists who performed 30 examinations or more per round at 8 centers (6 private, 2 public).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Probabilities of detecting 1, 2, or 3 or more adenomas, 1 adenoma 10 mm or larger, or colorectal cancer, as well as the corresponding adjusted (for patient age and sex) per-center detection rates.

RESULTS

Endoscopy centers were not significant predictors of the probability of detecting any category of neoplasia with the exception of the 2 adenomas or more category (P < .005). The ranges of the adjusted detection rates for each of these categories were 33.1% to 43.1%, 11.1% to 21.6%, 3.6% to 8.1%, 16.3% to 23.6%, and 8.3% to 12.6%, respectively. When the colonoscopies that were performed by the 11 endoscopists who performed 30 examinations or more per center in 2 or more centers were separately analyzed, no intercenter statistically significant variability was observed with the exception of 1 endoscopist and the 1 adenoma category. In a subgroup of 1100 colonoscopies performed by 6 endoscopists who were working at the same 3 centers, intercenter variability was not statistically significant.

LIMITATIONS

Type II error because of sample sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

In our setting, intercenter variability did not explain interendoscopist variability for neoplasia detection rate.

摘要

背景

我们之前的研究显示,在参与大规模筛查计划的结肠镜检查医生中,腺瘤检出率存在显著差异。但导致这种差异的原因尚不清楚。

目的

研究不同中心间结直肠肿瘤检出率的差异。

设计和地点

对法国筛查项目前两轮结肠镜检查结果的二次分析:逻辑回归和方差重复测量分析。

材料

19 名内镜医生共进行了 3487 例结肠镜检查,每位医生在 8 个中心(6 家私人诊所和 2 家公立医院)进行 30 次或以上的结肠镜检查。

主要观察指标

检出 1 个、2 个或 3 个或更多腺瘤、1 个 10mm 或更大的腺瘤或结直肠癌的概率,以及相应的每中心检出率(调整患者年龄和性别)。

结果

除了检出 2 个或更多腺瘤的类别外(P<0.005),内镜中心不是检测任何结直肠肿瘤类别的概率的显著预测因子。这些类别的调整检出率范围分别为 33.1%至 43.1%、11.1%至 21.6%、3.6%至 8.1%、16.3%至 23.6%和 8.3%至 12.6%。当单独分析在 2 个或以上中心完成 30 次或以上结肠镜检查的 11 名内镜医生的结肠镜检查时,除了 1 名内镜医生和 1 个腺瘤类别外,没有观察到各中心间统计学上显著的差异。在由在 3 个相同中心工作的 6 名内镜医生进行的 1100 例结肠镜检查的亚组中,各中心间的差异无统计学意义。

局限性

由于样本量的限制,存在 II 型错误。

结论

在我们的研究中,不同中心间的差异并不能解释结直肠肿瘤检出率的内镜医生间的差异。

相似文献

1
Neoplasia detection rates after positive fecal occult blood test results are not affected by endoscopy center: a population-based study.阳性粪便潜血试验结果后的肿瘤检出率不受内镜中心影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1179.
2
Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing.内镜医师在结直肠肿瘤检出率方面的差异及其对基于粪便潜血试验后结肠镜检查的区域性筛查计划的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.032. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
3
One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon.采用粪便潜血联合检测及远端结肠检查进行一次性结直肠癌筛查。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 23;345(8):555-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010328.
4
Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).免疫化学粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查的质量:EQuIPE 研究(评估内镜性能质量指标)。
Gut. 2015 Sep;64(9):1389-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307954. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
5
Measurement of adenoma detection and discrimination during colonoscopy in routine practice: an exploratory study.在常规实践中测量结肠镜检查中的腺瘤检出和鉴别:一项探索性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Dec;74(6):1325-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.038. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
6
Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies.腺瘤检出率随一天中的时间和病例等级变化很小:2139 例首次筛查结肠镜检查的前瞻性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):554-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.021.
7
The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.每例手术中腺瘤的平均数量应成为衡量结肠镜检查肿瘤检出率的金标准:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Feb;46(2):176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.08.129. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
8
Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.结肠镜检查:按适应证对其癌症和腺瘤检出率的综述。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Mar;90(3):353-65.
9
Comparison of a brush-sampling fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin with a sensitive guaiac-based fecal occult blood test in detection of colorectal neoplasia.用于检测血红蛋白的刷取粪便免疫化学检测法与基于愈创木脂的灵敏粪便潜血检测法在结直肠肿瘤检测中的比较。
Cancer. 2006 Nov 1;107(9):2152-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22230.
10
Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates.结直肠癌不同筛查策略的随机试验:患者反应及检出率
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):347-57. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji050.