• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The RAD score: a simple acute asthma severity score compares favorably to more complex scores.RAD 评分:一种简单的急性哮喘严重程度评分与更复杂的评分相比具有优势。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Jul;107(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.03.011. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
2
Spirometry and PRAM severity score changes during pediatric acute asthma exacerbation treatment in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科小儿急性哮喘加重期治疗期间的肺功能测定和PRAM严重程度评分变化
J Asthma. 2013 Mar;50(2):204-8. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.752503. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
3
Noninvasive bedside assessment of acute asthma severity using single-breath counting.使用单次呼吸计数对急性哮喘严重程度进行无创床边评估。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014 Jan;30(1):8-10. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000060.
4
Pulse Oximeter Plethysmograph Estimate of Pulsus Paradoxus as a Measure of Acute Asthma Exacerbation Severity and Response to Treatment.脉搏血氧饱和度仪容积描记法对奇脉的评估作为急性哮喘加重严重程度及治疗反应的一项指标
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):315-22. doi: 10.1111/acem.12886. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
Noninvasive assessment of asthma severity using pulse oximeter plethysmograph estimate of pulsus paradoxus physiology.使用脉搏血氧计 plethysmograph 估计脉搏矛盾生理学无创评估哮喘严重程度。
BMC Pulm Med. 2010 Mar 29;10:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-10-17.
6
Validation of the Spanish version of the Pediatric Asthma Severity Score (PASS) in a population of Hispanic children.验证西班牙语版儿科哮喘严重程度评分(PASS)在西班牙裔儿童人群中的适用性。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024 Jul;59(7):1987-1994. doi: 10.1002/ppul.27033. Epub 2024 May 2.
7
Noninvasive testing of lung function and inflammation in pediatric patients with acute asthma exacerbations.急性哮喘加重期儿科患者肺功能和炎症的无创检测
J Asthma. 2012 Feb;49(1):29-35. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.637599. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
8
The Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure: a valid clinical score for assessing acute asthma severity from toddlers to teenagers.儿童呼吸评估量表:一种用于评估从幼儿到青少年急性哮喘严重程度的有效临床评分。
J Pediatr. 2008 Apr;152(4):476-80, 480.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.08.034. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
9
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
10
The Preschool Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM): a responsive index of acute asthma severity.学龄前儿童呼吸评估量表(PRAM):急性哮喘严重程度的反应性指标。
J Pediatr. 2000 Dec;137(6):762-8. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2000.110121.

引用本文的文献

1
Airway transcriptome networks identify susceptibility to frequent asthma exacerbations in children.气道转录组网络确定儿童频繁哮喘发作的易感性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Jul;152(1):73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.02.031. Epub 2023 Mar 12.
2
Pediatric acute asthma scoring systems: a systematic review and survey of UK practice.儿科急性哮喘评分系统:一项对英国实践的系统评价与调查
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jun 2;1(5):1000-1008. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12083. eCollection 2020 Oct.
3
Current practices in children with severe acute asthma across European PICUs: an ESPNIC survey.欧洲 PICUs 中重度急性哮喘患儿的现行治疗方法:ESPENIC 调查。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Mar;179(3):455-461. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03502-9. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
4
ATS Core Curriculum 2017: Part II. Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine.《2017年美国胸科学会核心课程:第二部分。儿科肺医学》
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Aug;14(Suppl_2):S165-S181. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201702-143CME.
5
Direct concurrent comparison of multiple pediatric acute asthma scoring instruments.多种儿科急性哮喘评分工具的直接并行比较。
J Asthma. 2017 Sep;54(7):741-753. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2016.1258081. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
6
Clinical Scores for Dyspnoea Severity in Children: A Prospective Validation Study.儿童呼吸困难严重程度的临床评分:一项前瞻性验证研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0157724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157724. eCollection 2016.
7
Performance of the Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS) for acute asthma research protocols.急性哮喘强度研究评分(AAIRS)在急性哮喘研究方案中的表现。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012 Jul;109(1):78-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 May 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure: a valid clinical score for assessing acute asthma severity from toddlers to teenagers.儿童呼吸评估量表:一种用于评估从幼儿到青少年急性哮喘严重程度的有效临床评分。
J Pediatr. 2008 Apr;152(4):476-80, 480.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.08.034. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
2
Clinical measures associated with FEV1 in persons with asthma requiring hospital admission.
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 May;25(4):425-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.09.006.
3
Detecting asthma exacerbations in a pediatric emergency department using a Bayesian network.使用贝叶斯网络在儿科急诊科检测哮喘急性发作
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:684-8.
4
Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values.综述:缺失值插补的简要介绍
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1087-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.014. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
5
Age related reference ranges for respiration rate and heart rate from 4 to 16 years.4至16岁呼吸率和心率的年龄相关参考范围。
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Nov;90(11):1117-21. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.068718. Epub 2005 Jul 27.
6
Asthma severity scores for preschoolers displayed weaknesses in reliability, validity, and responsiveness.学龄前儿童哮喘严重程度评分在可靠性、有效性和反应性方面存在不足。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Nov;57(11):1177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.016.
7
Performance of a novel clinical score, the Pediatric Asthma Severity Score (PASS), in the evaluation of acute asthma.一种新型临床评分——儿童哮喘严重程度评分(PASS)在急性哮喘评估中的表现。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;11(1):10-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.07.015.
8
Acute severe asthma.急性重症哮喘
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Oct 1;168(7):740-59. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200208-902SO.
9
The Preschool Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM): a responsive index of acute asthma severity.学龄前儿童呼吸评估量表(PRAM):急性哮喘严重程度的反应性指标。
J Pediatr. 2000 Dec;137(6):762-8. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2000.110121.
10
Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.评估反应性的方法:批判性综述与建议
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 May;53(5):459-68. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00206-1.

RAD 评分:一种简单的急性哮喘严重程度评分与更复杂的评分相比具有优势。

The RAD score: a simple acute asthma severity score compares favorably to more complex scores.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Jul;107(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.03.011. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2011.03.011
PMID:21704881
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3760486/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute asthma severity scores facilitate assessment and implementation of timely and appropriate therapy for pediatric patients but are complex and challenging for clinicians to use at the bedside.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether a simple, bedside acute asthma severity score comprising 3 standard clinical measures performs as well as more comprehensive asthma scores.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled participants 5 to 17 years of age with acute asthma exacerbations. We recorded 3 asthma scores at baseline and after 2 hours of treatment: the Pediatric Asthma Severity Score (PASS), the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM), and the RAD score (Respiratory rate; Accessory muscle use; Decreased breath sounds). We assessed each score for criterion validity in predicting baseline percent forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%FEV(1)) and for responsiveness in predicting change of %FEV(1) after 2 hours of treatment using multiple linear regression models adjusted for age, race, sex, and Global Initiative for Asthma chronic control.

RESULTS

Of 536 participants included for analyses, median age was 8.8 years, 60% were male, and 58% were African American. The 3 acute asthma scores demonstrated similar criterion validity to explain variation of baseline %FEV(1) (R(2): 0.434 [PASS]; 0.462 [PRAM]; 0.426 [RAD]), but none demonstrated clinically significant responsiveness to change in %FEV(1) (R(2): 0.109 [PASS]; 0.106 [PRAM]; 0.139 [RAD]).

CONCLUSIONS

The RAD score, comprising 3 routinely measured bedside clinical parameters, is a simple and easily used instrument for assessing the severity of an acute asthma exacerbation and has comparable criterion validity and improved responsiveness when compared with 2 more complex acute asthma scores.

摘要

背景

急性哮喘严重程度评分有助于评估和实施儿科患者的及时和适当治疗,但对于临床医生来说,在床边使用这些评分非常复杂和具有挑战性。

目的

评估由 3 项标准临床测量组成的简单床边急性哮喘严重程度评分与更全面的哮喘评分表现相当。

方法

我们前瞻性纳入了 5 至 17 岁的急性哮喘加重患者。我们在基线和治疗 2 小时后记录了 3 项哮喘评分:小儿哮喘严重程度评分(PASS)、小儿呼吸评估量表(PRAM)和 RAD 评分(呼吸频率;辅助肌肉使用;呼吸音减弱)。我们使用多元线性回归模型评估了每个评分在预测基线 1 秒用力呼气量百分比(%FEV(1))方面的标准有效性,并评估了在调整年龄、种族、性别和全球哮喘倡议慢性控制后,2 小时治疗后 %FEV(1)变化的反应性。

结果

在纳入分析的 536 名参与者中,中位年龄为 8.8 岁,60%为男性,58%为非裔美国人。这 3 项急性哮喘评分在解释基线 %FEV(1)变异方面具有相似的标准有效性(R(2):0.434 [PASS];0.462 [PRAM];0.426 [RAD]),但没有一项评分在 %FEV(1)变化方面表现出明显的临床反应性(R(2):0.109 [PASS];0.106 [PRAM];0.139 [RAD])。

结论

RAD 评分由 3 项常规床边临床参数组成,是一种简单易用的评估急性哮喘发作严重程度的工具,与 2 种更复杂的急性哮喘评分相比,它具有相似的标准有效性和改善的反应性。