Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115-5899, USA.
J Health Econ. 2011 Jul;30(4):675-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.014. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
In 1998, Medicare adopted a per diem Prospective Payment System (PPS) for skilled nursing facility care, which was intended to deter the use of high-cost rehabilitative services. The average per diem decreased under the PPS, but because per diems increased for greater therapy minutes, the ability of the PPS to deter the use of high-intensity services was questionable. In this study, we assess how the PPS affected the volume and intensity of Medicare services. By volume we mean the product of the number of Medicare residents in a facility and the average length-of-stay, by intensity we mean the time per week devoted to rehabilitation therapy. Our results indicate that the number of Medicare residents decreased under PPS, but rehabilitative services and therapy minutes increased while length-of-stay remained relatively constant. Not surprisingly, when subsequent Medicare policy changes increased payment rates, Medicare volume far surpassed the levels seen in the pre-PPS period.
1998 年,医疗保险采用了按日预付制(PPS)来支付疗养院护理费用,旨在遏制高成本康复服务的使用。PPS 下的每日费用有所下降,但由于治疗时间更长的每日费用增加,PPS 遏制高强度服务使用的能力受到质疑。在这项研究中,我们评估了 PPS 如何影响医疗保险服务的数量和强度。按数量计算,是指设施中的医疗保险居民人数与平均住院时间的乘积;按强度计算,是指每周用于康复治疗的时间。我们的结果表明,在 PPS 下,医疗保险居民的数量减少了,但康复服务和治疗时间增加了,而住院时间相对保持不变。毫不奇怪,当随后的医疗保险政策变化增加了支付率时,医疗保险的数量远远超过了 PPS 前的水平。