• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗服务提供者支付激励措施:来自美国临终关怀行业的证据。

Provider payment incentives: Evidence from the U.S. hospice industry.

作者信息

Coe Norma B, Rosenkranz David A

机构信息

Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Department of Economics at Fordham University, 441 E Fordham Road, Dealy Hall, Bronx, NY 10458, USA.

出版信息

J Public Econ. 2025 Aug;248. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105435. Epub 2025 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105435
PMID:40686541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12269558/
Abstract

Combining capitation with a cap on health care providers' average revenue can reduce allocative inefficiency. But the cap may be undercut by health care providers who churn their patient censuses. We investigate this possibility in the U.S. hospice industry, where Medicare pays hospice programs fixed daily rates but caps their average annual revenue. By leveraging variation generated by the cap's nonlinear design and the transition between fiscal years, we find that programs on track to exceed the cap raise enrollment rates by 5.8 % and live discharge rates by 4.3 % in the fourth quarter. But this churning falls far short of eliminating their financial penalties: it amounts to 10 % of an average program's excess revenue at most. Marginal enrollees have longer remaining lifetimes and more fragmented hospice spells on average, suggesting weaker intrinsic demand for hospice care. We discuss the cap's implications for market structure.

摘要

将按人头付费与对医疗服务提供者平均收入设置上限相结合,可以减少配置效率低下的问题。但这一上限可能会被那些频繁更换患者名单的医疗服务提供者削弱。我们在美国临终关怀行业研究了这种可能性,在该行业中,医疗保险按每日固定费率向临终关怀项目付费,但对其平均年收入设置了上限。通过利用上限的非线性设计以及财年之间的过渡所产生的差异,我们发现,在第四季度,即将超过上限的项目将入学率提高了5.8%,将存活出院率提高了4.3%。但这种人员更替远远不足以消除它们的经济处罚:最多相当于平均项目超额收入的10%。边际参保者平均剩余寿命更长,临终关怀期更分散,这表明对临终关怀服务的内在需求较弱。我们讨论了上限对市场结构的影响。

相似文献

1
Provider payment incentives: Evidence from the U.S. hospice industry.医疗服务提供者支付激励措施:来自美国临终关怀行业的证据。
J Public Econ. 2025 Aug;248. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105435. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
2
Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.低收入国家卫生系统的财务安排:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 11;9(9):CD011084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011084.pub2.
3
Payment methods for outpatient care facilities.门诊护理机构的支付方式。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 3;3(3):CD011153. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011153.pub2.
4
Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.提高初级保健中戒烟率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational use of medicines.药品政策:封顶价和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 8;2015(5):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.pub2.
7
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.经济激励措施对初级保健医生所提供医疗服务质量的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
10
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational drug use.药品政策:封顶支付和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.

本文引用的文献

1
Market segmentation by profit status: evidence from hospice.按盈利状况进行的市场细分:来自临终关怀机构的证据。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Nov 29;2(12):qxae160. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae160. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Comparison of the Pathway to Hospice Enrollment Between Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare.比较医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险的临终关怀入院途径。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Feb 3;4(2):e225457. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5457.
3
Hospice Improves Care Quality For Older Adults With Dementia In Their Last Month Of Life.临终关怀改善了生命最后一个月患有痴呆症的老年患者的护理质量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jun;41(6):821-830. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01985.
4
VOLUNTARY REGULATION: EVIDENCE FROM MEDICARE PAYMENT REFORM.自愿监管:医疗保险支付改革的证据
Q J Econ. 2022 Feb;137(1):565-618. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjab035. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Acquisitions of Hospice Agencies by Private Equity Firms and Publicly Traded Corporations.私营股权公司和上市公司收购临终关怀机构。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1113-1114. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6262.
6
Variation in Hospice Patient and Admission Characteristics by Referral Location.临终关怀患者的差异以及按转诊地点划分的入院特征
Med Care. 2020 Dec;58(12):1069-1074. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001415.
7
Provider Incentives and Healthcare Costs: Evidence from Long-Term Care Hospitals.医疗服务提供者激励措施与医疗成本:来自长期护理医院的证据。
Econometrica. 2018 Nov;86(6):2161-2219. doi: 10.3982/ECTA15022.
8
Better together: Coexistence of for-profit and nonprofit firms with an application to the U.S. hospice industry.更好地合作:营利性和非营利性公司的共存及其在美国临终关怀行业的应用。
J Health Econ. 2019 Jan;63:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
9
Strategic Patient Discharge: the Case of Long-Term Care Hospitals.战略性患者出院:以长期护理医院为例。
Am Econ Rev. 2018 Nov;108(11):3232-65.
10
Predictive modeling of U.S. health care spending in late life.预测美国老年人医疗保健支出的模型。
Science. 2018 Jun 29;360(6396):1462-1465. doi: 10.1126/science.aar5045.