Leisure M K, Moore D M, Schwartzman J D, Hayden G F, Donowitz L G
Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908.
JAMA. 1990;264(16):2111-2.
Although the Centers for Disease Control recommends that needles should never be recapped, many phlebotomists routinely recap and change needles before blood culture inoculation. This study compared the extrinsic contamination rate in blood cultures when the needle was and was not changed. One hundred eight medical students obtained 182 blood specimens from each other by means of standard methods. Each specimen was inoculated into two culture bottles. The first bottle was inoculated with the needle used for phlebotomy, and the second was inoculated after needle change. Four (2.2%) of 182 bottles were contaminated when the needle was not changed, compared with one (0.6%) when the needle was changed. This small difference was not statistically significant, and the likelihood of having failed to detect a 5% difference in contamination rate was small. The risk of needle-stick injury incurred by changing the needle before inoculation of blood culture bottles seems to be unjustified.
尽管疾病控制中心建议绝对不要重新盖帽,但许多采血人员在进行血培养接种前仍常规地重新盖帽并更换针头。本研究比较了更换针头和未更换针头时血培养中的外部污染率。108名医学生通过标准方法互相采集了182份血标本。每份标本接种到两个培养瓶中。第一个培养瓶用采血时使用的针头接种,第二个培养瓶在更换针头后接种。未更换针头时,182个培养瓶中有4个(2.2%)被污染,而更换针头时为1个(0.6%)。这种微小差异无统计学意义,未能检测到污染率5%差异的可能性很小。在接种血培养瓶前更换针头所带来的针刺伤风险似乎是不合理的。