Suppr超能文献

困难气道学会“ADEPT”指导意见:气道设备选择策略的基础,也是设备评估的策略。

The Difficult Airway Society 'ADEPT' guidance on selecting airway devices: the basis of a strategy for equipment evaluation.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2011 Aug;66(8):726-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06787.x. Epub 2011 Jun 24.

Abstract

Faced with the concern that an increasing number of airway management devices were being introduced into clinical practice with little or no prior evidence of their clinical efficacy or safety, the Difficult Airway Society formed a working party (Airway Device Evaluation Project Team) to establish a process by which the airway management community within the profession could itself lead a process of formal device/equipment evaluation. Although there are several national and international regulations governing which products can come on to the market and be legitimately sold, there has hitherto been no formal professional guidance relating to how products should be selected (i.e. purchased). The Airway Device Evaluation Project Team's first task was to formulate such advice, emphasising evidence-based principles. Team discussions led to a definition of the minimum level of evidence needed to make a pragmatic decision about the purchase or selection of an airway device. The Team concluded that this definition should form the basis of a professional standard, guiding those with responsibility for selecting airway devices. We describe how widespread adoption of this professional standard can act as a driver to create an infrastructure in which the required evidence can be obtained. Essential elements are that: (i) the Difficult Airway Society facilitates a coherent national network of research-active units; and (ii) individual anaesthetists in hospital trusts play a more active role in local purchasing decisions, applying the relevant evidence and communicating their purchasing decisions to the Difficult Airway Society.

摘要

面对越来越多的气道管理设备在临床实践中被引入,而这些设备的临床疗效或安全性几乎没有或根本没有先前的证据,气道管理学会成立了一个工作组(气道设备评估项目组),以建立一个流程,使该专业内的气道管理界能够自行进行正式的设备/器械评估。尽管有一些国家和国际法规规定了哪些产品可以进入市场并合法销售,但迄今为止,还没有关于如何选择产品(即购买)的正式专业指导。气道设备评估项目组的首要任务是制定此类建议,强调循证原则。团队讨论导致了对购买或选择气道设备的决策所需的最低证据水平的定义。该团队得出结论,该定义应构成专业标准的基础,为负责选择气道设备的人员提供指导。我们描述了广泛采用这一专业标准如何能够成为创建一个基础设施的驱动力,在该基础设施中,可以获得所需的证据。基本要素是:(i)气道管理学会促进了一个具有研究活力的全国性网络的协调一致;(ii)医院信托中的个别麻醉师在当地采购决策中发挥更积极的作用,应用相关证据并将其采购决策传达给气道管理学会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验