School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;26(2):245-53. doi: 10.1177/0269881111405355. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
We investigated (1) the effects of alcohol on cognitive biases for alcohol-related cues, (2) the effects of drinking status on alcohol-related cognitive biases and (3) the similarity of any effects of alcohol across two measures of alcohol cognitive bias. Healthy, heavy and light social alcohol users (n = 72) were examined in a single-blind placebo-controlled design. Participants received 0.00 g/kg, 0.13 g/kg or 0.40 g/kg of alcohol in a between-subjects design and then completed both a modified Stroop task and a visual probe task. Modified Stroop data indicated a main effect of cue type, which was qualified by drinking status, with heavier drinkers slower to respond to alcohol-related cues. Visual probe data, in contrast, indicated a significant interaction effect between validity (valid: alcohol-related, invalid: neutral) and drink condition. Participants receiving a moderate dose of alcohol (0.40 g/kg) were faster to respond to alcohol-related stimuli compared with participants receiving a low dose of alcohol or placebo. These data indicate that the cognitive processes assayed by the visual probe and Stroop tasks may not be mediated by a common underlying mechanism.
我们研究了(1)酒精对与酒精相关线索的认知偏差的影响,(2)饮酒状态对与酒精相关的认知偏差的影响,以及(3)酒精对两种酒精认知偏差测量方法的任何影响的相似性。在一项单盲安慰剂对照设计中,检查了健康、重度和轻度社交饮酒者(n = 72)。参与者在一个被试间设计中接受了 0.00 克/公斤、0.13 克/公斤或 0.40 克/公斤的酒精,然后完成了一个改良的 Stroop 任务和一个视觉探针任务。改良 Stroop 数据表明线索类型有一个主要的影响,这被饮酒状态所限定,重度饮酒者对与酒精相关的线索反应较慢。相比之下,视觉探针数据表明有效性(有效:与酒精相关,无效:中性)和饮酒条件之间存在显著的交互效应。与接受低剂量酒精或安慰剂的参与者相比,接受中等剂量酒精(0.40 克/公斤)的参与者对与酒精相关的刺激反应更快。这些数据表明,视觉探针和 Stroop 任务所测量的认知过程可能不是由一个共同的潜在机制介导的。