Bowen Natasha K, Powers Joelle D
School of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3550.
Res Soc Work Pract. 2005 Nov;15(6):491-500. doi: 10.1177/1049731505275553.
The purpose of the current study was to examine the practice validity of a new ecological assessment instrument for 3(rd) through 5(th) graders in terms of whether it provided school staff with new knowledge about students. METHOD: Pre-assessment knowledge of school staff was compared to data obtained from 21 children and their parents on 29 measures. Data were collected using the Elementary School Success Profile (ESSP). School staff pre-assessment knowledge was compared to obtained data across seven domains of children's lives (neighborhood, school, family, peers, parent educational involvement, well-being, and home behavior), data sources (child and parent), and grade level of students. RESULTS: Pre-assessment knowledge was not highly correlated with obtained data; pre-assessment expectations matched obtained data only about 41% of the time; and knowledge varied by domain, source, and grade level. CONCLUSIONS: Ecological assessments can address gaps in school staff's knowledge of targetable factors that influence the success of students.
本研究的目的是检验一种针对三年级至五年级学生的新生态评估工具的实践有效性,即它是否能为学校工作人员提供有关学生的新知识。方法:将学校工作人员的预评估知识与从21名儿童及其父母那里获得的关于29项指标的数据进行比较。数据通过小学成功概况(ESSP)收集。将学校工作人员的预评估知识与从儿童生活的七个领域(邻里、学校、家庭、同伴、家长教育参与、幸福感和家庭行为)、数据来源(儿童和家长)以及学生年级水平获得的数据进行比较。结果:预评估知识与获得的数据相关性不高;预评估期望仅在约41%的时间与获得的数据相符;并且知识因领域、来源和年级水平而异。结论:生态评估可以弥补学校工作人员在影响学生成功的可针对因素方面的知识差距。