• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知测试与小学成功档案中儿童报告数据的有效性

Cognitive Testing and the Validity of Child-Report Data from the Elementary School Success Profile.

作者信息

Bowen Natasha K

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

Soc Work Res. 2008 Jan 1;32(1):18. doi: 10.1093/swr/32.1.18.

DOI:10.1093/swr/32.1.18
PMID:20148125
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2818440/
Abstract

The Elementary School Success Profile (ESSP) is a social environmental assessment tool that collects data from 3(rd), 4(th), and 5(th) graders, their parents/guardians, and their teachers. Ensuring the validity of the data collected with the child report component was a primary concern during the development of the ESSP. This article describes how cognitive testing was used to promote the validity of ESSP child report data. Four types of response problems were identified in data collected from 58 children. Strategies to address problems are described, and evidence of the association between item modifications and improved performance is presented. Cognitive testing is recommended as a standard procedure in the development of child report instruments.

摘要

小学成功概况(ESSP)是一种社会环境评估工具,它从三年级、四年级和五年级的学生、他们的父母/监护人以及他们的教师那里收集数据。在ESSP的开发过程中,确保通过儿童报告部分收集的数据的有效性是一个主要关注点。本文描述了如何使用认知测试来提高ESSP儿童报告数据的有效性。从58名儿童收集的数据中识别出了四种类型的回答问题。描述了解决问题的策略,并展示了项目修改与表现改善之间关联的证据。建议将认知测试作为儿童报告工具开发中的标准程序。

相似文献

1
Cognitive Testing and the Validity of Child-Report Data from the Elementary School Success Profile.认知测试与小学成功档案中儿童报告数据的有效性
Soc Work Res. 2008 Jan 1;32(1):18. doi: 10.1093/swr/32.1.18.
2
A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Home Environment and Home Social Behavior Data from the Elementary School Success Profile for Families.对来自家庭小学成功概况的家庭环境和家庭社会行为数据的验证性因素分析。
Soc Work Res. 2011 Jun;35(2):117-127. doi: 10.1093/swr/35.2.117.
3
KNOWLEDGE GAPS AMONG SCHOOL STAFF AND THE ROLE OF HIGH QUALITY ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTS IN SCHOOLS.学校工作人员的知识差距以及高质量生态评估在学校中的作用。
Res Soc Work Pract. 2005 Nov;15(6):491-500. doi: 10.1177/1049731505275553.
4
Cognitive Pretesting and the Developmental Validity of Child Self-Report Instruments: Theory and Applications.认知预测试与儿童自我报告工具的发展效度:理论与应用
Res Soc Work Pract. 2004 May;14(3):191-200. doi: 10.1177/1049731503257882.
5
Family-Faculty Trust As Measured with the ESSP.用ESSP测量的家庭-教师信任度。
Child Sch. 2011 Jul 1;33(3):158-167. doi: 10.1093/cs/33.3.158.
6
SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTAL RISK AND PROTECTION: A TYPOLOGY WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS.社会环境风险与保护:一种对小学实践有启示意义的类型学
Child Sch. 2007;29(4):229-242. doi: 10.1093/cs/29.4.229.
7
Social-emotional screening status in early childhood predicts elementary school outcomes.幼儿期的社会情感筛查状况可预测小学阶段的结果。
Pediatrics. 2008 May;121(5):957-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1948.
8
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
9
Cafeteria assessment for elementary schools (CAFES): development, reliability testing, and predictive validity analysis.小学自助餐厅评估(CAFES):开发、可靠性测试和预测效度分析。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 3;18(1):1154. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6032-2.
10
Fuel for Fun: a cluster-randomized controlled study of cooking skills, eating behaviors, and physical activity of 4th graders and their families.趣味燃料:一项关于四年级学生及其家庭烹饪技能、饮食行为和身体活动的整群随机对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 May 26;16:444. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3118-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences with and Perceptions of the Child Welfare System During the Perinatal Period of Mothers with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.智力和发育障碍母亲围产期儿童福利系统的经历与认知
J Public Child Welf. 2025;19(4):751-773. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2024.2362685. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
2
Item selection in self-report measures for children and adolescents with disabilities: lessons from cognitive interviews.残障儿童和青少年自陈式量表的项目选择:认知访谈的经验教训。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2011 Dec;26(6):559-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
3
Child-Report Data and Assessment of the Social Environment in Schools.儿童报告数据与学校社会环境评估
Res Soc Work Pract. 2011 Jul;21(4):476-486. doi: 10.1177/1049731510391675.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive Pretesting and the Developmental Validity of Child Self-Report Instruments: Theory and Applications.认知预测试与儿童自我报告工具的发展效度:理论与应用
Res Soc Work Pract. 2004 May;14(3):191-200. doi: 10.1177/1049731503257882.
2
The Development and Evaluation of Procedures to Assess Child Self-report Item Validity.评估儿童自我报告项目效度的程序的开发与评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2006 Aug;66(4):687-700. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282467.
3
Cognitive research improves questionnaires.认知研究改进问卷。
Am J Public Health. 1989 Aug;79(8):1053-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.8.1053.