Suppr超能文献

解剖双束和过顶单束加关节外腱固定术:两种不同 ACL 重建中膝关节松弛度的体内定量评估。

Anatomic double-bundle and over-the-top single-bundle with additional extra-articular tenodesis: an in vivo quantitative assessment of knee laxity in two different ACL reconstructions.

机构信息

Laboratorio di Biomeccanica e Innovazione Tecnologica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jan;20(1):153-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1589-7. Epub 2011 Jun 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Combinations of intra- and extra-articular procedures have been proposed for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the aim of achieving an optimal control of translational and rotational knee laxities. Recently, the need for better reproducing the structural and functional behavior of the native anterior cruciate ligament led to the definition of anatomic double-bundle surgical approach. This study aimed to quantitatively verify whether the in vivo static and dynamic behavior obtained using over-the-top single-bundle with extra-articular tenodesis reconstruction was comparable to the results achieved by anatomic double-bundle approach.

METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive patients, with an isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury, were included in the study. Standard clinical laxities and pivot-shift test were quantified before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by means of a surgical navigation system dedicated to kinematic assessment; displacements of medial and lateral compartment during stress tests were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Single-bundle with extra-articular tenodesis approach presented statistically better laxity reduction in varus/valgus stress test at full extension and in internal/external rotation at 90° of flexion; lateral plasty controlled better the lateral compartment during drawer test and varus/valgus stress test both at 0° and 30° of flexion and both the compartments during internal/external rotation at 90° of flexion. On the other hand, pivot-shift phenomenon was better controlled by anatomic double-bundle reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the reconstructions worked similarly for static knee laxity. The extra-articular procedure played an important role in better constraining the displacement of lateral tibial compartment, whereas the anatomic double-bundle reconstruction better restored the dynamic behavior of knee joint highlighted under pivot-shift stress test.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

摘要

目的

为了实现对膝关节平移和旋转松弛度的最佳控制,已经提出了关节内和关节外手术相结合的方法,用于前交叉韧带重建。最近,为了更好地再现前交叉韧带的结构和功能行为,需要定义解剖双束手术方法。本研究旨在定量验证使用过顶式单束加关节外肌腱固定重建获得的体内静态和动态行为是否与解剖双束方法的结果相当。

方法

研究纳入了 35 例孤立性前交叉韧带损伤患者。使用专门用于运动评估的手术导航系统,在进行前交叉韧带重建前后,对标准临床松弛度和枢轴移位试验进行量化;还分析了在应力试验中内侧和外侧间隔的位移。

结果

单束加关节外肌腱固定方法在完全伸展时的内翻/外翻应力试验和 90°屈曲时的内/外旋转中,在统计学上显示出更好的松弛度降低;外侧成形术在抽屉试验和内翻/外翻应力试验中(在 0°和 30°屈曲时)更好地控制了外侧间隔的位移,在 90°屈曲时内/外旋转时也更好地控制了两个间隔的位移。另一方面,解剖双束重建更好地控制了枢轴移位现象。

结论

两种重建方法在静态膝关节松弛度方面效果相似。关节外手术在更好地限制外侧胫骨间隔的位移方面发挥了重要作用,而解剖双束重建更好地恢复了在枢轴移位试验下强调的膝关节动态行为。

研究设计

病例系列。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验