• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

pH 值对牧草地土壤中反硝化酶活性的影响与反硝化菌群落的固有差异有关。

Effect of pH on the denitrifying enzyme activity in pasture soils in relation to the intrinsic differences in denitrifier communities.

机构信息

Biology Centre of the ASCR, v.v.i. - Institute of Soil Biology, and University of South Bohemia - Faculty of Science, Na Sádkách 7, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2011 May;56(3):230-5. doi: 10.1007/s12223-011-0045-x. Epub 2011 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1007/s12223-011-0045-x
PMID:21710230
Abstract

The effects of pH on denitrifying enzyme activity (DEA) and on the ratio of the denitrification products, N(2)O and N(2), were determined in three pasture soils differing in cattle impact. The linkage between intrinsic differences in the denitrifying communities and pH effects on relative N(2)O production was also assessed. Soil pH values were adjusted just before DEA determination to obtain soil slurries with a range of pH values. The intrinsic differences in the denitrifier communities were assessed by measuring the kinetic constants of NO(3)(-) and N(2)O reductions. DEA for all three soils was highest at pH 8.4, regardless of native soil pH. Because DEA has typically been measured at native soil pH, our results suggest that DEA might have been underestimated in many previous studies. Further, relative N(2)O production at different pH values did not differ among the soils, even though the denitrifier communities differed in their intrinsic capability to reduce NO(3)(-) all the way to N(2), suggesting that the ratio of denitrification products (N(2)O and N(2)) is pH-specific rather than soil-specific. This suggests that manipulations of soil pH will alter N(2)O fluxes from agricultural soils.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨 pH 值对反硝化酶活性(DEA)和反硝化产物 N2O 和 N2 比例的影响,并评估反硝化群落的内在差异与 pH 值对相对 N2O 生成的影响之间的联系。在进行 DEA 测定之前,将土壤 pH 值调整至一定范围,以获得具有不同 pH 值的土壤悬浮液。通过测量 NO3-和 N2O 还原的动力学常数来评估反硝化菌群落的内在差异。所有三种土壤的 DEA 在 pH 值为 8.4 时最高,而与原生土壤 pH 值无关。由于 DEA 通常在原生土壤 pH 值下进行测量,因此我们的结果表明,在许多先前的研究中,DEA 可能被低估了。此外,尽管反硝化菌群落内在的将 NO3-还原为 N2 的能力存在差异,但不同 pH 值下的相对 N2O 生成没有差异,这表明反硝化产物(N2O 和 N2)的比例是 pH 特异性的,而不是土壤特异性的。这表明土壤 pH 值的调控将改变农业土壤中的 N2O 通量。

相似文献

1
Effect of pH on the denitrifying enzyme activity in pasture soils in relation to the intrinsic differences in denitrifier communities.pH 值对牧草地土壤中反硝化酶活性的影响与反硝化菌群落的固有差异有关。
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2011 May;56(3):230-5. doi: 10.1007/s12223-011-0045-x. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
2
Impact of Land Use Management and Soil Properties on Denitrifier Communities of Namibian Savannas.土地利用管理和土壤性质对纳米比亚稀树草原反硝化细菌群落的影响
Microb Ecol. 2015 Nov;70(4):981-92. doi: 10.1007/s00248-015-0623-6. Epub 2015 May 15.
3
Insights into the effect of soil pH on N(2)O and N(2) emissions and denitrifier community size and activity.探讨土壤 pH 值对 N(2)O 和 N(2)排放以及反硝化菌群落大小和活性的影响。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Mar;76(6):1870-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02484-09. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
4
Community-specific pH response of denitrification: experiments with cells extracted from organic soils.特定社区的反硝化 pH 响应:从有机土壤中提取细胞的实验。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Feb;79(2):530-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01233.x. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
5
Excessive use of nitrogen in Chinese agriculture results in high N(2) O/(N(2) O+N(2) ) product ratio of denitrification, primarily due to acidification of the soils.中国农业中氮肥的过度使用导致反硝化过程中 N(2) O/(N(2) O+N(2) )产物比偏高,主要是由于土壤酸化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 May;20(5):1685-98. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12461. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
6
High-Resolution Denitrification Kinetics in Pasture Soils Link N2O Emissions to pH, and Denitrification to C Mineralization.牧场土壤中的高分辨率反硝化动力学将一氧化二氮排放与pH值联系起来,并将反硝化作用与碳矿化联系起来。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 18;11(3):e0151713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151713. eCollection 2016.
7
Spatially tripartite interactions of denitrifiers in arctic ecosystems: activities, functional groups and soil resources.北极生态系统中反硝化菌的空间三分相互作用:活性、功能群和土壤资源。
Environ Microbiol. 2012 Sep;14(9):2601-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02814.x. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
8
Contrasting denitrifier communities relate to contrasting N2O emission patterns from acidic peat soils in arctic tundra.相反的反硝化菌群落与北极苔原生态系统酸性泥炭土壤中相反的 N2O 排放模式有关。
ISME J. 2012 May;6(5):1058-77. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.172. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
9
Acidophilic denitrifiers dominate the N2O production in a 100-year-old tea orchard soil.嗜酸反硝化菌在一个拥有百年历史的茶园土壤的一氧化二氮产生过程中占主导地位。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Mar;22(6):4173-82. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3653-6. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
10
[Characteristics of soil denitrifying enzyme activity in riparian zones with different land use types in Chongming Island, Shanghai of China].[中国上海崇明岛不同土地利用类型河岸带土壤反硝化酶活性特征]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Oct;24(10):2926-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of soil pH promotes nitrous oxide reduction and thus mitigates soil emissions of this greenhouse gas.管理土壤 pH 值可促进氧化亚氮的还原,从而减少这种温室气体的土壤排放。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20182. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56694-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Denitrification gene pools, transcription and kinetics of NO, N2O and N2 production as affected by soil pH.土壤 pH 对反硝化基因库、NO、N2O 和 N2 生成的转录和动力学的影响。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010 Jun;72(3):407-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00856.x. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
2
Mapping field-scale spatial patterns of size and activity of the denitrifier community.绘制反硝化细菌群落大小和活性的田间尺度空间模式图。
Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jun;11(6):1518-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01879.x. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
3
Adaptation of Denitrifying Populations to Low Soil pH.
适应低土壤 pH 值的反硝化种群。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 May;49(5):1053-6. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.5.1053-1056.1985.
4
Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO).作为大气痕量气体(氢气、一氧化碳、甲烷、羰基硫、一氧化二氮和一氧化氮)控制者的土壤微生物。
Microbiol Rev. 1996 Dec;60(4):609-40. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.4.609-640.1996.