Shimizu Motoko, Tanaka Katsuaki, Hagiwara Chie, Ikenaga Kazutake, Yoshioka Miwako, Asada Akira
Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 545-8586.
Masui. 2011 Jun;60(6):743-52.
Recently, the hospital information systems (HIS) and anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) have been rapidly improved and have been introduced into the clinical practice in Japan drastically; however, few reports have detailed their influences on clinical practice. We here report our experience.
We introduced HIS (EGMAIN-EX, Fujitsu Co., Ltd.) in our preoperative evaluation clinic and in the postoperative care unit. AIMS (ORSYS, Philips Electronics Japan) was introduced almost only to the intraoperative management.
It became easy for us to acquire patient's information and to share it with the medical staffs in the other departments. However, we had to invest large human resources for the introduction and maintenance of the HIS and the AIMS.
Though AIMS is more useful in anesthetic management than HIS, it seems to be more suitable for coordination with the medical staffs in the other departments to use HIS for perioperative management than to use AIMS.
近年来，医院信息系统（HIS）和麻醉信息管理系统（AIMS）得到了迅速发展，并在日本临床实践中得到广泛应用；然而，关于它们对临床实践影响的详细报道却很少。在此，我们报告我们的经验。
我们在术前评估门诊和术后护理单元引入了HIS（EGMAIN - EX，富士通有限公司）。AIMS（ORSYS，飞利浦电子日本公司）几乎仅用于术中管理。
我们获取患者信息并与其他科室医务人员共享变得更加容易。然而，我们在引入和维护HIS及AIMS方面投入了大量人力资源。
虽然AIMS在麻醉管理中比HIS更有用，但在围手术期管理中，与其他科室医务人员协调使用HIS似乎比使用AIMS更合适。
