Just M, Rösler H P, Kutzner J, Thelen M
Institut für Klinische Strahlenkunde, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz.
Rofo. 1990 Oct;153(4):451-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1033413.
The value of CT, conventional radiography and ultrasound was compared in 40 patients with 52 skeletal metastases. For superficial lesions, the combination of sonography and conventional radiography was equivalent to CT in showing the extent of bone destruction and soft tissue involvement. As expected sonography was unsatisfactory for deeper lesions. Sonography can provide useful information for planning radiation therapy for superficial lesions, but it does not replace conventional radiography.
对40例患有52处骨骼转移瘤的患者的CT、传统放射成像和超声检查的价值进行了比较。对于浅表病变，超声检查和传统放射成像相结合在显示骨质破坏范围和软组织受累情况方面与CT相当。正如预期的那样，超声检查对于较深部位的病变效果不佳。超声检查可为浅表病变的放射治疗计划提供有用信息，但它不能替代传统放射成像。
