Shook J E, Watkins W D, Camporesi E M
Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Oct;142(4):895-909. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/142.4.895.
In summary, these findings indicate the importance of designing future experiments that delineate between opioid and nonopioid forms of respiratory disease and dysfunction, and the need to identify means of diagnosing them in order to achieve successful recovery. Apparently there is great diversity between animal species in terms of contributions of endogenous opioids to tonic control of ventilation, and future work should strive to identify which species is most appropriate as a model of human ventilatory control and disease. Certain opioid receptor types appear to be linked to independent respiratory functions. For instance, mu receptors in the brain stem produce strong inhibitory actions on respiratory parameters, including RR, VT, VE, and CO2 sensitivity. These effects have been observed in vivo and by electrophysiologic recordings in vitro. Delta receptors may also exert some inhibitory effect on respiration, especially in the NTS. In the CNS, the ventral surfaces of the medulla and pons, especially the NTS and NA, seem to be important sites for opioid-induced inhibition of respiration, whereas the spinal cord probably is not involved in opioid-mediated ventilatory depression. Kappa receptors appear to be devoid of respiratory depressant activity, whereas sigma receptors may stimulate some ventilatory parameters. Morphine and similar pure mu agonists, such as fentanyl and oxymorphine, probably produce their analgesic and respiratory depressant effects through stimulation of mu receptors. Mixed agonists/antagonists that have mu antagonist (or partial agonist) activity plus kappa agonist and/or sigma agonist activity show a ceiling effect for respiratory depression. Future tests need to determine which opioid receptor may be responsible for the ceiling effect. In addition, the effects of mu, delta, kappa, and sigma selective agonists on hypoxic drive should also be determined, as a drug that stimulates hypoxic sensitivity in the face of hypercapnic depression may produce less overall respiratory depression due to counteractive effects. In the future, clinically optimal opiates should have more specificity of action than those available now. This may be achieved by creating drugs selective for single receptors or by creating drugs with desirable combinations of receptor selectivities. The combinations of mixed agonists/antagonists with pure mu agonists currently in use today are promising, as they provide analgesia with reduced respiratory depression. In the early days of opiate research and development, combination drug regimens were thoroughly tested to determine the "ideal ratios" that would retain analgesic properties but not the other undesirable effects such as respiratory depression (196).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
总之,这些发现表明设计未来实验的重要性,这些实验要区分阿片类和非阿片类形式的呼吸系统疾病及功能障碍,并且需要确定诊断它们的方法以实现成功康复。显然,在内源性阿片类物质对通气的紧张性控制的贡献方面,动物物种之间存在很大差异,未来的工作应努力确定哪种物种最适合作为人类通气控制和疾病的模型。某些阿片受体类型似乎与独立的呼吸功能有关。例如,脑干中的μ受体对呼吸参数产生强烈的抑制作用,包括呼吸频率(RR)、潮气量(VT)、每分钟通气量(VE)和二氧化碳敏感性。这些效应已在体内和体外电生理记录中观察到。δ受体也可能对呼吸产生一些抑制作用,尤其是在孤束核(NTS)中。在中枢神经系统中,延髓和脑桥的腹侧表面,特别是NTS和疑核(NA),似乎是阿片类物质诱导呼吸抑制的重要部位,而脊髓可能不参与阿片类物质介导的通气抑制。κ受体似乎没有呼吸抑制活性,而σ受体可能刺激一些通气参数。吗啡和类似的纯μ激动剂,如芬太尼和羟吗啡酮,可能通过刺激μ受体产生镇痛和呼吸抑制作用。具有μ拮抗剂(或部分激动剂)活性加上κ激动剂和/或σ激动剂活性的混合激动剂/拮抗剂对呼吸抑制显示出封顶效应。未来的测试需要确定哪种阿片受体可能是封顶效应的原因。此外,还应确定μ、δ、κ和σ选择性激动剂对低氧驱动的影响,因为一种在高碳酸血症抑制情况下刺激低氧敏感性的药物可能由于抵消作用而产生较少的总体呼吸抑制。未来,临床上最佳的阿片类药物应比目前可用的药物具有更高的作用特异性。这可以通过研发对单一受体具有选择性的药物或具有理想受体选择性组合的药物来实现。目前使用的混合激动剂/拮抗剂与纯μ激动剂的组合很有前景,因为它们在提供镇痛作用的同时减少了呼吸抑制。在阿片类药物研发的早期,对联合用药方案进行了全面测试,以确定能保留镇痛特性但不产生其他不良影响(如呼吸抑制)的“理想比例”(196)。(摘要截取自400字)