• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

延长高剂量来曲唑方案与短低剂量来曲唑方案作为 GnRH 拮抗剂方案在接受 IVF-ET 的卵巢低反应患者中的辅助治疗。

Extended high dose letrozole regimen versus short low dose letrozole regimen as an adjuvant to gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011 Dec;27(12):1018-22. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2011.579661. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

DOI:10.3109/09513590.2011.579661
PMID:21714697
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of extended high dose letrozole regimen/HPuFSH-gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRHant) protocol with short low dose letrozole regimen/HPuFSH-GnRHant protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, 136 women who responded poorly to GnRH agonist long protocol in their first IVF cycle were randomized into two equal groups using computer generated list and were treated in the second IVF cycle by either extended letrozole regimen (5 mg/day during the first 5 days of cycle and 2.5 mg/day during the subsequent 3 days) combined with HPuFSH-GnRHant protocol or short letrozole regimen (2.5 mg/day from cycle day 3-7) combined with HPuFSH-GnRHant protocol.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between both groups with regard to number of oocytes retrieved and clinical pregnancy rate (5.39 ± 2.08 vs. 5.20 ± 1.88 and 22.06% vs. 16.18%, respectively).The total gonadotropins dose and medications cost per cycle were significantly lower in extended letrozole group (44.87 ± 9.16 vs. 59.97 ± 14.91 ampoules and 616.52 ± 94.97 vs. 746.84 ± 149.21 US Dollars ($), respectively).The cost-effectiveness ratio was 2794 $ in extended letrozole group and 4616 $ in short letrozole group.

CONCLUSION

Extended letrozole regimen/HPuFSH-GnRHant protocol was more cost-effective than short letrozole regimen/HPuFSH-GnRHant protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET.

摘要

目的

比较延长高剂量来曲唑方案/高纯度尿促卵泡激素(HPuFSH)-促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂(GnRHant)与短低剂量来曲唑方案/HPuFSH-GnRHant 方案在接受体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)的卵巢反应不良患者中的疗效和成本效益。

方法

本随机对照试验纳入了在首次 IVF 周期中对 GnRH 激动剂长方案反应不良的 136 名患者,采用计算机生成的列表将其随机分为两组,在第二次 IVF 周期中分别采用延长来曲唑方案(周期第 1-5 天 5mg/天,随后 3 天 2.5mg/天)联合 HPuFSH-GnRHant 方案或短来曲唑方案(周期第 3-7 天 2.5mg/天)联合 HPuFSH-GnRHant 方案进行治疗。

结果

两组在获卵数和临床妊娠率方面无显著差异(分别为 5.39±2.08 枚与 5.20±1.88 枚和 22.06%与 16.18%)。延长来曲唑组的总促性腺激素剂量和每个周期的药物费用均显著降低(分别为 44.87±9.16IU 与 59.97±14.91IU 安瓿和 616.52±94.97 美元与 746.84±149.21 美元)。延长来曲唑组的成本效益比为 2794 美元,短来曲唑组为 4616 美元。

结论

在接受 IVF-ET 的卵巢反应不良患者中,延长来曲唑方案/HPuFSH-GnRHant 方案比短低剂量来曲唑方案/HPuFSH-GnRHant 方案更具成本效益。

相似文献

1
Extended high dose letrozole regimen versus short low dose letrozole regimen as an adjuvant to gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET.延长高剂量来曲唑方案与短低剂量来曲唑方案作为 GnRH 拮抗剂方案在接受 IVF-ET 的卵巢低反应患者中的辅助治疗。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011 Dec;27(12):1018-22. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2011.579661. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
2
Minimal stimulation protocol using letrozole versus microdose flare up GnRH agonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI.在接受 ICSI 的卵巢反应不良的女性中,使用来曲唑的微刺激方案与 GnRH 激动剂微剂量爆发方案的比较。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013 Feb;29(2):105-8. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2012.730569. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
3
Management of poor responders: can outcomes be improved with a novel gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist/letrozole protocol?低反应者的管理:一种新型促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂/来曲唑方案能否改善结局?
Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.013. Epub 2007 May 4.
4
A randomized single-blind controlled trial of letrozole as a low-cost IVF protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a preliminary report.来曲唑作为低成本体外受精方案用于卵巢反应不良女性的随机单盲对照试验:初步报告
Hum Reprod. 2004 Sep;19(9):2031-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh359. Epub 2004 Jun 24.
5
Oral medications including clomiphene citrate or aromatase inhibitors with gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation.口服药物,包括枸橼酸氯米芬或芳香化酶抑制剂与促性腺激素联合用于接受体外受精的女性的控制性卵巢刺激。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;11(11):CD008528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008528.pub3.
6
Letrozole and gonadotropins versus luteal estradiol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with a prior low response to ovarian stimulation.来曲唑和促性腺激素与黄体期雌激素和促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案在卵巢刺激反应低下的妇女中的比较。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun;95(7):2330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.103. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
7
GnRH antagonist/letrozole versus microdose GnRH agonist flare protocol in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization.拮抗剂/来曲唑与小剂量 GnRH 激动剂在体外受精中对卵巢低反应患者的作用。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;49(3):297-301. doi: 10.1016/S1028-4559(10)60064-2.
8
Cost-effectiveness comparison between pituitary down-regulation with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist short regimen on alternate days and an antagonist protocol for assisted fertilization treatments.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂短方案和拮抗剂方案在辅助生殖治疗中降调节的成本效益比较。
Fertil Steril. 2013 May;99(6):1615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.095. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
9
Low-dose GnRH antagonist protocol is as effective as the long GnRH agonist protocol in unselected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.在接受体外受精和胚胎移植的未经选择的患者中,低剂量 GnRH 拮抗剂方案与长 GnRH 激动剂方案同样有效。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;50(4):432-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2011.10.006.
10
Letrozole and gonadotropins versus luteal estradiol and GnRH-antagonist protocol: additional concerns.来曲唑与促性腺激素对比黄体期雌二醇与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案:其他问题
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun 30;95(8):e78; author reply e80. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis.辅助生殖的控制性卵巢刺激方案:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD012586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012586.pub2.
2
Evaluation of the Impact of Letrozole in Combination with the GnRH Antagonist Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Patients Expected to Have a Poor Ovarian Response (POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4).评价来曲唑联合 GnRH 拮抗剂卵巢刺激方案对预计卵巢反应不良患者(POSEIDON 分组 3 和 4)的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 28;60(3):407. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030407.
3
Extended doxycycline treatment versus salpingectomy in the management of patients with hydrosalpinx undergoing IVF-ET.
在接受 IVF-ET 的患者中,与输卵管切除术相比,延长多西环素治疗对输卵管积水的处理。
J Ovarian Res. 2020 Jun 12;13(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00665-0.
4
Does daily co administration of gonadotropins and letrozole during the ovarian stimulation improve IVF outcome for poor and sub optimal responders?在卵巢刺激过程中,每天联合使用促性腺激素和来曲唑是否能改善卵巢反应不良和低反应患者的 IVF 结局?
J Ovarian Res. 2020 Jun 8;13(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00666-z.
5
Letrozole as co-treatment agent in ovarian stimulation antagonist protocol in poor responders: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.来曲唑作为卵巢刺激拮抗剂方案中低反应者的联合治疗药物:一项双盲随机临床试验。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019 Sep 22;17(9):653-660. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v17i9.5101. eCollection 2019 Sep.