Health technology assessment (HTA) increasingly important in spine research.
作者信息
van Tulder Maurits
出版信息
Eur Spine J. 2011 Jul;20(7):999-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1885-4. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Health technology assessment (HTA) increasingly important in spine research.
Eur Spine J. 2011 Jul;20(7):999-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1885-4. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
2
Perspectives on "early dialogue" between a manufacturer and health technology assessment agencies.
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):607. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.003.
3
Biosimilars: evidential standards for health technology assessment.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Mar;87(3):257-61. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.112.
4
Technology assessment applied to the spine.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):2025-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318183bb9e.
5
The need for Health Technology Assessments of PET.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Oct;30(10):1438-9; author reply 1439. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1294-y. Epub 2003 Jul 31.
6
Health technology assessment of PET in oncology: re Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30:637-641.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004 Feb;31(2):295-7; author reply 297-8; discussion 298. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1391-y.
7
Are health technology assessments a reliable tool in th analysis of the clinical value of PET in oncology? Who audits the auditors?
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 May;30(5):637-41. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1203-4.
8
Robotics in trauma and orthopaedics.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 May;100(6_sup):8-15. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.supp1.8.
9
Evidence-based decision-making 3: Health technology assessment.
Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1281:417-41. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_25.
10
Health technology assessment.
Singapore Med J. 2006 Mar;47(3):187-92; quiz 193.
引用本文的文献
1
MRI image features with an evident relation to low back pain: a narrative review.
Eur Spine J. 2023 May;32(5):1830-1841. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07602-x. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
A comparative analysis of a disposable and a reusable pedicle screw instrument kit for lumbar arthrodesis: integrating HTA and MCDA.
Health Econ Rev. 2017 Dec;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13561-017-0153-7. Epub 2017 May 3.
3
Differences among primary care patients with different mechanical patterns of low back pain: a cross-sectional investigation.
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 7;6(12):e013060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013060.
4
Market approval processes for new types of spinal devices: challenges and recommendations for improvement.
Eur Spine J. 2016 Sep;25(9):2993-3003. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4606-1. Epub 2016 May 27.
5
The Nijmegen decision tool for chronic low back pain. Development of a clinical decision tool for secondary or tertiary spine care specialists.
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 18;9(8):e104226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104226. eCollection 2014.
6
Predictive factors for successful clinical outcome 1 year after an intensive combined physical and psychological programme for chronic low back pain.
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jan;23(1):102-12. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2844-z. Epub 2013 Jun 16.
7
The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.
Eur Spine J. 2012 Feb;21(2):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2127-5. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
8
The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.
Eur Spine J. 2012 Feb;21(2):185-94. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2126-6. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
Zotero 插件