在评估钳夹型股骨髋臼撞击症中,中心边缘角的可靠性和可预测性。
Reliability and predictability of the centre-edge angle in the assessment of pincer femoroacetabular impingement.
机构信息
Trauma & Orthopaedics, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Hamstel Road, Harlow, Essex, UK.
出版信息
Int Orthop. 2012 Mar;36(3):505-10. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1302-y. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
PURPOSE
The aim of the study was to assess the use of the centre-edge (CE) angle in the assessment of pincer femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) for reliability and predictability in the diagnosis.
METHODS
Between 2004 and 2008, 55 patients underwent surgical treatment for FAI. A control group of 30 was identified among patients attending the emergency department with normal radiographs. Radiographs were assessed by two independent observers both before and after the operation. Nine patients with trauma were excluded. The magnetic resonance arthrogram reports of the remaining 46 patients were assessed for pincer FAI. Nineteen patients were identified and underwent repeat radiographic assessment. All underwent surgical dislocation of hip (SDH), acetabular, with/without femoral osteochondroplasty. Acetabular depth and version were also assessed. The intraclass correlation (ICC) was used to assess reliability of the CE angle. The paired t test and independent groups t test were used to assess the difference between the pincer FAI group, both pre-op and post-op and against controls.
RESULTS
The control and pincer groups were similar in demographics (p=0.1769). Coxa profunda was present in 14 patients with eight also having retroverted acetabuli. Of the rest two had retroverted acetabuli and one protrusio. The mean CE angle in the control group was 31.4°, in the pre-op pincer group 46.2° and in the post-op pincer group 38.3°. The ICC for intra-observer correlation was 0.977 and 0.992 pre-op and 0.986 and 0.974 post-op. The ICC for inter-observer correlation was 0.960 and 0.957 pre-op and 0.979 and 0.967 post-op.The p value was <0.001 between the controls, the pre-op and post-op pincer groups. The test characteristics using the CE angle ≥ 40 is a reasonably good predictor of FAI, with a sensitivity of 84.2% and a specificity of 100%.
CONCLUSIONS
The pincer FAI can be reliably assessed with the CE angle and can be predicted in patients presenting with FAI.
目的
本研究旨在评估中心边缘(CE)角在评估钳夹型股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)中的可靠性和预测性,以用于诊断。
方法
2004 年至 2008 年间,55 例 FAI 患者接受了手术治疗。在急诊就诊的正常 X 线片患者中,确定了一个对照组,共 30 例。在术前和术后,由两名独立观察者对 X 线片进行评估。排除了 9 例创伤患者。对其余 46 例患者的磁共振关节造影报告进行了钳夹型 FAI 的评估。发现 19 例患者,并对其进行了重复的放射学评估。所有患者均接受了髋关节(SDH)切开术,髋臼切开术,伴/不伴股骨骨软骨成形术。髋臼深度和髋臼前倾角也进行了评估。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估 CE 角的可靠性。配对 t 检验和独立样本 t 检验用于评估钳夹型 FAI 组患者术前、术后与对照组之间的差异。
结果
对照组和钳夹组的人口统计学特征相似(p=0.1769)。14 例患者存在髋臼深,其中 8 例髋臼后倾。其余 2 例髋臼后倾,1 例髋臼前突。对照组的平均 CE 角为 31.4°,钳夹组术前为 46.2°,术后为 38.3°。术前观察者内相关性的 ICC 为 0.977,术后为 0.992;术前观察者间相关性的 ICC 为 0.960,术后为 0.957。术前和术后观察者间相关性的 ICC 为 0.979,术后为 0.967。p 值<0.001,对照组与术前、术后钳夹组之间存在差异。使用 CE 角≥40°作为 FAI 的预测指标具有良好的预测性,其敏感性为 84.2%,特异性为 100%。
结论
使用 CE 角可以可靠地评估钳夹型 FAI,并可预测出现 FAI 的患者。